Differences in 4D aortic motion derived from 3T bSSFP CMR between Marfan syndrome patients and healthy volunteers
Motivation: New biomarkers are needed to guide aortic surgery to prevent aortic dissection in Marfan syndrome (MFS). Goal(s): To investigate differences in aortic motion between healthy volunteers and (subgroups of) MFS patients. Approach: We apply a recently published novel non-contrast enhanced, free breathing, time-resolved 3D balanced steady free precession CMR scan with a machine learning based algorithm for automatic aortic segmentations to evaluate 4D aortic motion. Results: We found significant differences in aortic motion between patients with- and without a history of aortic root surgery and healthy volunteers. Thus, aortic motion might be a novel marker for aortic disease severity in MFS. Impact: The differences in 4D aortic motion measured using 3D CINE balanced steady state free precession CMR between healthy volunteers and (subgroups of) Marfan syndrome patients might provide a new marker for disease severity in Marfan syndrome.
Authors
- Eric Schrauben (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7922-3615)
- Pim van Ooij (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8755-0192)
- Daniëlle Robbers‐Visser
- Aart J. Nederveen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5477-973X)
- Daan Bosshardt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0559-6985)
- Renske Merton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0147-0939)
- Maarten Groenink (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5837-0472)
- Moniek G.P.J. Cox (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2825-8428)
- Roland R.J. van Kimmenade (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8207-8906)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
- Published
- 2024-11-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.58530/2024/0287
- Primary Topic
- Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00