Toward Task-Based Reconstruction: Evaluating Relationships Between Reconstruction and Object Detection Performance
Motivation: Traditional medical image reconstruction emphasizes standard metrics, potentially overlooking optimization for downstream tasks like segmentation and anomaly detection. Goal(s): Our study investigates the relationship between standard reconstruction and object detection metrics. Approach: We trained a Faster R-CNN detector for meniscal anomalies, addressing class imbalance and implementing a custom detection-specific augmentation protocol. Results: Evaluation on reconstructed datasets revealed that reconstruction quality was associated with true predictions but had a limited impact on overall detection performance, while boxes-based reconstruction metrics showed no correlation with prediction outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of considering associations between standard reconstruction and downstream task metrics when optimizing end-to-end pipelines. Impact: Evaluation of standard reconstruction metrics, sliced by object detection outcomes, revealed a significant association between reconstruction and detection performance, emphasizing the utility of this approach in assessing task-based reconstruction.
Authors
- Valentina Pedoia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9745-955X)
- Aniket Tolpadi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3974-4838)
- Johanna Luitjens
- Paula Giesler
- Rupsa Bhattacharjee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9893-3527)
- Felix G. Gassert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2260-8597)
- N. A. Konovalova (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7589-9821)
- Sharmila Majumdar
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
- Published
- 2024-11-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.58530/2024/1193
- Primary Topic
- Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00