Comparison of Spontaneous Brain Activity between Hippocampal Sclerosis and MRI-Negative Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
Motivation: There has been controversy regarding the pathophysiological basis of MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE-N) and its similarities and differences relative to TLE with hippocampal sclerosis (TLE-HS). Goal(s): Static and dynamic abnormalities of spontaneous brain activity (SBA) in TLE-HS and TLE-N were examined. Approach: Six static SBA indicators and corresponding temporal dynamic indicators were calculated using a sliding window approach, then compared. Results: Patterns of change in SBA abnormalities were generally similar between TLE-HS and TLE-N groups; they were more pronounced in the TLE-HS group. VMHC in the hippocampus showed promise for differential diagnosis. Many indicators were correlated with cognition. Impact: The use of static and dynamic metrics can convey a more detailed and reliable description of abnormal neuronal activity, facilitating exploration of epileptic activity and cognitive impairment mechanism in MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and TLE with hippocampal sclerosis.
Authors
- Keran Ma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9097-7998)
- Jingliang Cheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6996-329X)
- Chengru Song (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6983-9857)
- Mengzhu Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1059-0441)
- Xinyue Mao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1918-1724)
- Shaoqiang Han (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7331-0315)
- Yong Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1942-1839)
- Xiaonan Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0710-8773)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
- Published
- 2024-11-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.58530/2024/3218
- Primary Topic
- Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00