No observation of DIANA signals in rats at 7.0 and 17.2 Tesla

Motivation: Direct Imaging of Neuronal Activity (DIANA) was proposed by Toi et al. in Science 2022. Before DIANA can be adopted, key findings must be reproduced. Goal(s): Independent reproduction of the results shown in supplemental Figure 26 of Toi et al. Approach: Rats were scanned at 7.0T and 17.2T using a visual paradigm consisting of a 10ms blue flash every 200ms. Results: No DIANA signal was detected, even though the temporal signal to noise ratio was sufficient to detect signal changes of 0.1%. However, a slow hemodynamic signal, much larger than the expected DIANA signal, was observed between measurements with and without stimulus. Impact: Our failure to detect a DIANA signal in rat at 7.0T and 17.2T, echo's findings by Hodono et al. (Imaging Neuroscience) and Choi et al. (bioRxiv), indicating DIANA is not ready for use in neuroscientific studies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58530/2024/0131
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No observation of DIANA signals in rats at 7.0 and 17.2 Tesla

Erwan Selingue, Luisa Ciobanu, Shota Hodono, Martijn A. Cloos
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

No observation of DIANA signals in rats at 7.0 and 17.2 Tesla

Erwan Selingue, Luisa Ciobanu, Shota Hodono, Martijn A. Cloos
article en

Abstract

Motivation: Direct Imaging of Neuronal Activity (DIANA) was proposed by Toi et al. in Science 2022. Before DIANA can be adopted, key findings must be reproduced. Goal(s): Independent reproduction of the results shown in supplemental Figure 26 of Toi et al. Approach: Rats were scanned at 7.0T and 17.2T using a visual paradigm consisting of a 10ms blue flash every 200ms. Results: No DIANA signal was detected, even though the temporal signal to noise ratio was sufficient to detect signal changes of 0.1%. However, a slow hemodynamic signal, much larger than the expected DIANA signal, was observed between measurements with and without stimulus. Impact: Our failure to detect a DIANA signal in rat at 7.0T and 17.2T, echo's findings by Hodono et al. (Imaging Neuroscience) and Choi et al. (bioRxiv), indicating DIANA is not ready for use in neuroscientific studies.

Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.