Impact of Matching Network Losses on RF Coil Q and SNR at Low Field Strengths.

Motivation: RF Coil design for low frequencies. Goal(s): Demonstrate the impact of losses in different matching network topologiesApproach: we compared three- and four-element matching networks on 12 cm diameter coils at 10, 23.55, and 63.6 MHz. and evaluated coil loss and SNR. Results: At 10 and 23.55MHz, the coils with three-element (single stage) matching networks exhibited approximately 50% lower unloaded Q compared to coils with four-element matching networks, whereas unloaded Q values were within 3% for three- and four-element matched coils at 63.6MHz. SNR at 23.55MHz (0.55T) was approximately 30% higher for the four-element matched coil over the three-element matched coil. Impact: Resistive losses in four-element matching networks can be significantly lower than those of three-element networks at low frequencies or for lightly loaded coils, resulting in higher quality factor and SNR.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58530/2024/1403
Primary Topic
Microwave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Matching Network Losses on RF Coil Q and SNR at Low Field Strengths.

Karthik Lakshmanan, Ryan Brown, Bili Wang
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Microwave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
article

Impact of Matching Network Losses on RF Coil Q and SNR at Low Field Strengths.

Karthik Lakshmanan, Ryan Brown, Bili Wang
article en

Abstract

Motivation: RF Coil design for low frequencies. Goal(s): Demonstrate the impact of losses in different matching network topologiesApproach: we compared three- and four-element matching networks on 12 cm diameter coils at 10, 23.55, and 63.6 MHz. and evaluated coil loss and SNR. Results: At 10 and 23.55MHz, the coils with three-element (single stage) matching networks exhibited approximately 50% lower unloaded Q compared to coils with four-element matching networks, whereas unloaded Q values were within 3% for three- and four-element matched coils at 63.6MHz. SNR at 23.55MHz (0.55T) was approximately 30% higher for the four-element matched coil over the three-element matched coil. Impact: Resistive losses in four-element matching networks can be significantly lower than those of three-element networks at low frequencies or for lightly loaded coils, resulting in higher quality factor and SNR.

Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Microwave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of Matching Network Losses on RF Coil Q and SNR at Low Field Strengths. — Karthik Lakshmanan, Ryan Brown, et al. · Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS