Spatial modelling of large ungulate biomass in the gazetted protected areas and conservancies in Zimbabwe

Understanding large ungulate quantities that can be sustained in protected areas (PAs) is key for implementing strategic management plans in PAs. Studies that have estimated LUB and the associated ecological carrying capacity in PAs using spatially-explicit rainfall data are few. Thus, this study aimed to assess LUB in the gazetted protected areas and conservancies in Zimbabwe using the biomass logarithmic models fed with satellite-based rainfall and soil nutrient availability (SNA). Pearson’s correlation was used to establish the spatial relationship between vegetation cover and LUB. Analysis of Covariance was applied to assess LUB model performance across different SNA levels with SNA, vegetation cover, and LUB as the explanatory, covariate, and response variable, respectively. Variation of LUB across different PA categories was assessed using One Way ANOVA. Results showed a significant positive association of vegetation cover with LUB on low SNA (r=0.4, p=0.03), medium SNA (r=0.53, p=0.002), and high SNA areas (r=0.69, p<0.001). Results revealed the significant relevance of rainfall and SNA in determining the spatial distribution of LUB(F(2,86)=51.76, p<0.01). Findings also indicated significant variation of LUB between different PA categories (F(4,145)=67.62, p<0.01). These Findings could guide conservation planning regarding wildlife translocation, stocking, destocking, rangeland monitoring, and ecological integrity maintenance within PAs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geology Ecology and Landscapes
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2024.2430047
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial modelling of large ungulate biomass in the gazetted protected areas and conservancies in Zimbabwe

Mhosisi Masocha, Paradzayi Tagwireyi, Henry Ndaimani, Mark Zvidzai et al.
Geology Ecology and Landscapes
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Spatial modelling of large ungulate biomass in the gazetted protected areas and conservancies in Zimbabwe

Mhosisi Masocha, Paradzayi Tagwireyi, Henry Ndaimani, Mark Zvidzai, Knowledge K. Mawere
article en

Abstract

Understanding large ungulate quantities that can be sustained in protected areas (PAs) is key for implementing strategic management plans in PAs. Studies that have estimated LUB and the associated ecological carrying capacity in PAs using spatially-explicit rainfall data are few. Thus, this study aimed to assess LUB in the gazetted protected areas and conservancies in Zimbabwe using the biomass logarithmic models fed with satellite-based rainfall and soil nutrient availability (SNA). Pearson’s correlation was used to establish the spatial relationship between vegetation cover and LUB. Analysis of Covariance was applied to assess LUB model performance across different SNA levels with SNA, vegetation cover, and LUB as the explanatory, covariate, and response variable, respectively. Variation of LUB across different PA categories was assessed using One Way ANOVA. Results showed a significant positive association of vegetation cover with LUB on low SNA (r=0.4, p=0.03), medium SNA (r=0.53, p=0.002), and high SNA areas (r=0.69, p<0.001). Results revealed the significant relevance of rainfall and SNA in determining the spatial distribution of LUB(F(2,86)=51.76, p<0.01). Findings also indicated significant variation of LUB between different PA categories (F(4,145)=67.62, p<0.01). These Findings could guide conservation planning regarding wildlife translocation, stocking, destocking, rangeland monitoring, and ecological integrity maintenance within PAs.

Geology Ecology and LandscapesVol. 10(1)
International Fund for Animal Welfare (US), University of Zimbabwe (ZW), Zimbabwe National Water Authority (ZW)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.