Discrepancies between Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting and other T1 and T2 mapping methods are microstructure dependent

Motivation: T1 and T2 accuracy in the brain is difficult to assess, since there is no ground truth available. Goal(s): To investigate how well relaxometry methods agree. Approach: We compare Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) T1 and T2 mapping with Variable Flip Angle (VFA) T1 mapping and Multi-Echo Spin Echo (T2) mapping in 11 anatomical brain regions for 10 healthy volunteers, and in the relevant spheres of the NIST phantom. Results: MRF underestimates T1 and T2 in comparison with T1 VFA and T2 MESE in the human brain, especially in myelin-dense areas. Less T1 and no T2 bias is present in the NIST phantom. Impact: Quantitative T1 and T2 relaxometry techniques are more consistent in the NIST phantom than the human brain. Deviations could be caused by magnetisation transfer, whose impact on T1 and T2 relaxation mechanisms needs further investigation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58530/2024/2178
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discrepancies between Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting and other T1 and T2 mapping methods are microstructure dependent

Stefanie Thust, Rebecca Quest, Iulius Dragonu, Peter Lally et al.
1 links
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

Discrepancies between Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting and other T1 and T2 mapping methods are microstructure dependent

Stefanie Thust, Rebecca Quest, Iulius Dragonu, Peter Lally, Matthew Orton, Simran Kukran, Mary E. Finnegan, Ben K. Statton, Dow‐Mu Koh, Servando Cardona, Matthew Grech‐Sollars, Luke Dixon, Joely Smith, Neal K. Bangerter
article en

Abstract

Motivation: T1 and T2 accuracy in the brain is difficult to assess, since there is no ground truth available. Goal(s): To investigate how well relaxometry methods agree. Approach: We compare Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) T1 and T2 mapping with Variable Flip Angle (VFA) T1 mapping and Multi-Echo Spin Echo (T2) mapping in 11 anatomical brain regions for 10 healthy volunteers, and in the relevant spheres of the NIST phantom. Results: MRF underestimates T1 and T2 in comparison with T1 VFA and T2 MESE in the human brain, especially in myelin-dense areas. Less T1 and no T2 bias is present in the NIST phantom. Impact: Quantitative T1 and T2 relaxometry techniques are more consistent in the NIST phantom than the human brain. Deviations could be caused by magnetisation transfer, whose impact on T1 and T2 relaxation mechanisms needs further investigation.

Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.