TRANSLATION, CULTURAL ADAPTATION, RELIABILITY, AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE HEADACHE IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE

Objective: To prove the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Headache Impact Questionnaire (HImQ) for evaluating individuals with headaches. Method: 102 individuals (31.12±12.39 years) with headaches participated in the study. Test-retest and internal consistency analyses were used to assess the reliability of the HImQ, and Exploratory (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and correlation analysis was used to determine its validity. For correlation analysis, the total scores of the HImQ, Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), and Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) were calculated. Results: The Turkish version of the HImQ demonstrated high reliability with an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of 0.846 and a Cronbach’s α of 0.769. Structural validity through EFA indicated a three-factor structure, supported by KMO (0.759) and Bartlett’s sphericity test values (780.133; p<0.001). CFA confirmed this structure with good fit indices. Convergent validity was supported by good correlations between the HImQ and HIT-6 (r=0.429; p=0.000), and MIDAS (r=0.487; p=0.000). No floor or ceiling effects were detected. Conclusion: This study established the Turkish HImQ as a reliable and valid measure for evaluating the impact of headaches on daily functioning. With strong internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and supported validity, the scale proved effective for clinical and research use in the Turkish-speaking people. It provides a solid framework for assessing headache-related disability in daily life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Karya Journal of Health Science
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52831/kjhs.1534151
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Migraine and Headache Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TRANSLATION, CULTURAL ADAPTATION, RELIABILITY, AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE HEADACHE IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE

Halime Arıkan
1 citations
Karya Journal of Health Science
Migraine and Headache Studies
0.39
article

TRANSLATION, CULTURAL ADAPTATION, RELIABILITY, AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE HEADACHE IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE

Halime Arıkan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective: To prove the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Headache Impact Questionnaire (HImQ) for evaluating individuals with headaches. Method: 102 individuals (31.12±12.39 years) with headaches participated in the study. Test-retest and internal consistency analyses were used to assess the reliability of the HImQ, and Exploratory (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and correlation analysis was used to determine its validity. For correlation analysis, the total scores of the HImQ, Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), and Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) were calculated. Results: The Turkish version of the HImQ demonstrated high reliability with an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of 0.846 and a Cronbach’s α of 0.769. Structural validity through EFA indicated a three-factor structure, supported by KMO (0.759) and Bartlett’s sphericity test values (780.133; p<0.001). CFA confirmed this structure with good fit indices. Convergent validity was supported by good correlations between the HImQ and HIT-6 (r=0.429; p=0.000), and MIDAS (r=0.487; p=0.000). No floor or ceiling effects were detected. Conclusion: This study established the Turkish HImQ as a reliable and valid measure for evaluating the impact of headaches on daily functioning. With strong internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and supported validity, the scale proved effective for clinical and research use in the Turkish-speaking people. It provides a solid framework for assessing headache-related disability in daily life.

Karya Journal of Health ScienceVol. 5(3)
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Migraine and Headache Studies
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.