Groundings in French and Indonesian narrative discourses: linguistic and culture analysis

Abstract This study conducts a comparative analysis of grounding strategies employed in French and Indonesian narrative discourse. Utilizing both qualitative and quantitative methodologies, the research draws upon a corpus of French and Indonesian novels to examine the linguistic mechanisms utilized to establish grounding in these languages. This research questions the different markers of grounding in French and Indonesian narrative discourses, the types of grounding meanings, the role of culture in grounding, and what elements can strengthen grounding. The results of the textual analysis reveal that French employs the use of tenses, specifically the passé simple and imparfait (past tenses), to convey grounding, whereas Indonesian utilizes affixes, specifically the “ me(N)- ” and “ di- ” prefixes, for the same purpose. Further, the analysis illustrates that the “ me(N)- ” affix can be utilized to express both backgrounding and foregrounding, while the “ di- ” affix is restricted to foregrounding. Additionally, Indonesian also employs the use of third-person singular pronouns—“ dia ” and “ ia ”—to enhance grounding. The contextual analysis also highlights that in Indonesian narrative discourse, there is a tendency to repeat self-names as a form of politeness. This conclusion applies to languages that use tenses (e.g., French and English) as grounding markers and applies to languages that use affixes for grounding markers (e.g., Indonesian and Malay).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04117-8
Primary Topic
Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Groundings in French and Indonesian narrative discourses: linguistic and culture analysis

Sajarwa Sajarwa
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
article

Groundings in French and Indonesian narrative discourses: linguistic and culture analysis

Sajarwa Sajarwa
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study conducts a comparative analysis of grounding strategies employed in French and Indonesian narrative discourse. Utilizing both qualitative and quantitative methodologies, the research draws upon a corpus of French and Indonesian novels to examine the linguistic mechanisms utilized to establish grounding in these languages. This research questions the different markers of grounding in French and Indonesian narrative discourses, the types of grounding meanings, the role of culture in grounding, and what elements can strengthen grounding. The results of the textual analysis reveal that French employs the use of tenses, specifically the passé simple and imparfait (past tenses), to convey grounding, whereas Indonesian utilizes affixes, specifically the “ me(N)- ” and “ di- ” prefixes, for the same purpose. Further, the analysis illustrates that the “ me(N)- ” affix can be utilized to express both backgrounding and foregrounding, while the “ di- ” affix is restricted to foregrounding. Additionally, Indonesian also employs the use of third-person singular pronouns—“ dia ” and “ ia ”—to enhance grounding. The contextual analysis also highlights that in Indonesian narrative discourse, there is a tendency to repeat self-names as a form of politeness. This conclusion applies to languages that use tenses (e.g., French and English) as grounding markers and applies to languages that use affixes for grounding markers (e.g., Indonesian and Malay).

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 11(1)
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.