Can Information About Stiffness Perception be Inferred from Action Signals Using Models?

We use sensory feedback to form our perception, and control our movements and forces (actions). There is an ongoing debate about the relation between perception and action, with evidence in both directions. For example, there are cases in which perceptual illusions affect action signals and cases where they do not. However, even when they do, it is unknown if perceptual information can be inferred from action signals alone. To answer this question, we utilized a perceptual illusion created by artificial tactile skin stretch, which increases stiffness perception, and affects grip force. We used data recorded in a stiffness discrim-ination task in which participants compared pairs of virtual objects, comprised of force and artificial skin stretch and indicated which they perceived as stiffer. We explored if models could predict participants' perceptual responses, and the increase in stiffness perception caused by the skin stretch, solely from their recorded action signals. That is, with no information provided about the stimuli. We found that participants' perceptual augmentation could be predicted to an extent from their action signals alone. We predicted the average augmentation effect across participants, and a general trend of increased predicted perceptual aug-mentation for increased real perceptual augmentation. These results indicate that at least some perceptual information is present in action signals. Furthermore, of the action signals examined, grip force was neces-sary for predicting the augmentation effect, and a motion signal (e.g., position) was needed for predicting human-like perception, shedding light on what information may be present in the different signals.<b>Significance Statement</b> We utilized artificial skin stretch and models to explore if participants' actions are indicative of their per-ception, and found that aspects of perception can be predicted from action signals. Furthermore, our results shed light on which action signals are needed for predicting human-like perception, and which are indicative of the skin stretch augmentation effect. Beyond the scientific insights, this work could be used for the design of haptic feedback for force-displaying technologies. Trained models can be used to receive action signals and estimate the perceptual effect of different haptic stimuli. This can be advantageous, as it is commonly possible to record users' action signals, however, the experiments required to measure perceptual effects are often long and require many repetitions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
eNeuro
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1523/eneuro.0495-23.2024
Primary Topic
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Information About Stiffness Perception be Inferred from Action Signals Using Models?

Hanna Kossowsky, Ilana Nisky
eNeuro
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
article

Can Information About Stiffness Perception be Inferred from Action Signals Using Models?

Hanna Kossowsky, Ilana Nisky
article en

Abstract

We use sensory feedback to form our perception, and control our movements and forces (actions). There is an ongoing debate about the relation between perception and action, with evidence in both directions. For example, there are cases in which perceptual illusions affect action signals and cases where they do not. However, even when they do, it is unknown if perceptual information can be inferred from action signals alone. To answer this question, we utilized a perceptual illusion created by artificial tactile skin stretch, which increases stiffness perception, and affects grip force. We used data recorded in a stiffness discrim-ination task in which participants compared pairs of virtual objects, comprised of force and artificial skin stretch and indicated which they perceived as stiffer. We explored if models could predict participants' perceptual responses, and the increase in stiffness perception caused by the skin stretch, solely from their recorded action signals. That is, with no information provided about the stimuli. We found that participants' perceptual augmentation could be predicted to an extent from their action signals alone. We predicted the average augmentation effect across participants, and a general trend of increased predicted perceptual aug-mentation for increased real perceptual augmentation. These results indicate that at least some perceptual information is present in action signals. Furthermore, of the action signals examined, grip force was neces-sary for predicting the augmentation effect, and a motion signal (e.g., position) was needed for predicting human-like perception, shedding light on what information may be present in the different signals.<b>Significance Statement</b> We utilized artificial skin stretch and models to explore if participants' actions are indicative of their per-ception, and found that aspects of perception can be predicted from action signals. Furthermore, our results shed light on which action signals are needed for predicting human-like perception, and which are indicative of the skin stretch augmentation effect. Beyond the scientific insights, this work could be used for the design of haptic feedback for force-displaying technologies. Trained models can be used to receive action signals and estimate the perceptual effect of different haptic stimuli. This can be advantageous, as it is commonly possible to record users' action signals, however, the experiments required to measure perceptual effects are often long and require many repetitions.

eNeuroVol. 11(12)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, Israel Science Foundation, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.