Comparison between objective and subjective postoperative intraocular pressure immediately after cataract surgery

Objective intraocular pressure was significantly lower than subjective intraocular pressure, regardless of surgeons' experience. This study showed that the subjective method is unreliable compared to the gold standard (Perkins tonometer) and does not improve with surgeons' experience. Establishing standard training methods is paramount to developing surgeons' skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.2023-0174
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison between objective and subjective postoperative intraocular pressure immediately after cataract surgery

Gustavo Rosa Gameiro, Júlia Furtado Heringer, Maria Fernanda Abalem, Pedro Carlos Carricondo
1 citations
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
0.54
article

Comparison between objective and subjective postoperative intraocular pressure immediately after cataract surgery

Gustavo Rosa Gameiro, Júlia Furtado Heringer, Maria Fernanda Abalem, Pedro Carlos Carricondo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective intraocular pressure was significantly lower than subjective intraocular pressure, regardless of surgeons' experience. This study showed that the subjective method is unreliable compared to the gold standard (Perkins tonometer) and does not improve with surgeons' experience. Establishing standard training methods is paramount to developing surgeons' skills.

Arquivos Brasileiros de OftalmologiaVol. 88(3)
University of Michigan (US), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.