A (IR)RETROATIVIDADE DA LEI 14.230/2021 EM RELAÇÃO À NECESSIDADE DO DOLO PARA A CONFIGURAÇÃO DE ATOS DE IMPROBIDADE ADMINISTRATIVA, À LUZ DA JURISPRUDÊNCIA DOS TRIBUNAIS SUPERIORES

The research addresses the (non-)retroactivity of the provisions of Law No. 14,230/2021 in the context of administrative misconduct, specifically regarding the requirement of intent (dolo) for acts causing damage to the public treasury. The analysis examines the normative and jurisprudential evolution of Law No. 8,429/1992, highlighting the amendment that excluded negligence (culpa) from the typification of misconduct. The study discusses the principles of Administrative Sanctioning Law, legal certainty, and beneficial retroactivity, emphasizing debates about the application of more favorable rules to cases with final judgments. It concludes that defining the criteria for accountability represents progress but raises questions about balancing the protection of public assets and fundamental rights.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista fisio&terapia.
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69849/revistaft/fa10202411261522
Primary Topic
Brazilian Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A (IR)RETROATIVIDADE DA LEI 14.230/2021 EM RELAÇÃO À NECESSIDADE DO DOLO PARA A CONFIGURAÇÃO DE ATOS DE IMPROBIDADE ADMINISTRATIVA, À LUZ DA JURISPRUDÊNCIA DOS TRIBUNAIS SUPERIORES

Mariana de Siqueira, José Antônio de Albuquerque Neto
Revista fisio&terapia.
Brazilian Legal Issues
article

A (IR)RETROATIVIDADE DA LEI 14.230/2021 EM RELAÇÃO À NECESSIDADE DO DOLO PARA A CONFIGURAÇÃO DE ATOS DE IMPROBIDADE ADMINISTRATIVA, À LUZ DA JURISPRUDÊNCIA DOS TRIBUNAIS SUPERIORES

Mariana de Siqueira, José Antônio de Albuquerque Neto
article en

Abstract

The research addresses the (non-)retroactivity of the provisions of Law No. 14,230/2021 in the context of administrative misconduct, specifically regarding the requirement of intent (dolo) for acts causing damage to the public treasury. The analysis examines the normative and jurisprudential evolution of Law No. 8,429/1992, highlighting the amendment that excluded negligence (culpa) from the typification of misconduct. The study discusses the principles of Administrative Sanctioning Law, legal certainty, and beneficial retroactivity, emphasizing debates about the application of more favorable rules to cases with final judgments. It concludes that defining the criteria for accountability represents progress but raises questions about balancing the protection of public assets and fundamental rights.

Revista fisio&terapia.Vol. 29(140)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Brazilian Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.