Rational expectations tests on financial analysts’ cash flow forecasts

Purpose This study investigates whether financial analysts process information efficiently when they make cash flow forecasts. Design/methodology/approach Using a sample of 3,967 observations spanning 2004–2016, we perform empirical analyses by regressing actual cash flows on previous cash flow forecasts for the current period and a vector of information variables known to the analysts at the time of the forecasts. Findings We find that analysts do not incorporate past stock returns or past cash flow information efficiently when they generate cash flow forecasts. We also find weak evidence that analysts do not incorporate past consensus cash flow forecasts or past accruals information when they generate cash flow forecasts. Practical implications Our findings contribute to the analyst forecast efficiency literature and highlight the difference between analyst cash flow forecast efficiency and earnings forecast efficiency. Originality/value While extant research on whether analysts use publicly available information efficiently when generating earnings forecasts documents mixed findings (e.g. DeBondt and Thaler, 1990; Abarbanell and Bernard, 1992; Basu and Markov, 2004; Evans et al ., 2017), our results regarding analysts’ cash flow forecast efficiency are unambiguous.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Managerial Finance
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmf-03-2024-0162
Primary Topic
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rational expectations tests on financial analysts’ cash flow forecasts

Kenneth Zheng, He Ting
International Journal of Managerial Finance
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
article

Rational expectations tests on financial analysts’ cash flow forecasts

Kenneth Zheng, He Ting
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates whether financial analysts process information efficiently when they make cash flow forecasts. Design/methodology/approach Using a sample of 3,967 observations spanning 2004–2016, we perform empirical analyses by regressing actual cash flows on previous cash flow forecasts for the current period and a vector of information variables known to the analysts at the time of the forecasts. Findings We find that analysts do not incorporate past stock returns or past cash flow information efficiently when they generate cash flow forecasts. We also find weak evidence that analysts do not incorporate past consensus cash flow forecasts or past accruals information when they generate cash flow forecasts. Practical implications Our findings contribute to the analyst forecast efficiency literature and highlight the difference between analyst cash flow forecast efficiency and earnings forecast efficiency. Originality/value While extant research on whether analysts use publicly available information efficiently when generating earnings forecasts documents mixed findings (e.g. DeBondt and Thaler, 1990; Abarbanell and Bernard, 1992; Basu and Markov, 2004; Evans et al ., 2017), our results regarding analysts’ cash flow forecast efficiency are unambiguous.

International Journal of Managerial FinanceVol. 21(2)
University of Wyoming (US), Lewis University (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.