Effect of Active Filler on the Interfacial Adhesion between Granite Aggregate and Asphalt Mastic: Investigation of the Mechanism

To investigate the characteristics and mechanism of fillers’ influence on the interfacial adhesion properties between asphalt mastic and granite aggregate, four kinds of active fillers were selected to replace limestone mineral powder (LMP) in four proportions. Firstly, composite asphalt mastic (CAM) was prepared, and the adhesion property of the interface between different asphalt mastic and granite aggregate was evaluated based on the surface free energy (SFE). The optimum replacement rates were recommended by immersion Marshall tests and freeze–thaw splitting tests, and the water-temperature durability performance of granite asphalt mixtures under different treatment measures was verified by Hamburg rutting tests. Microproperty tests were carried out to analyze the effect of fillers on interfacial adhesion properties and mechanisms. The results showed that the alkaline minerals in the active fillers increased the Lewis base fraction of the asphalt mastic, which enhanced the SFE of the mastic. The maximum increase of the energy ratio (ER) with calcium carbide slag powder (CCSP) was 17%, and its enhancement of interfacial adhesion performance exceeded that of the other three active fillers. In addition, at the 60% replacement rate, CCSP improved MS0 and freeze-thaw split test strength ratio (TSR) by 9% and 15%, respectively, which exceeded the improvements from using OPC (7% and 14%, respectively). Comprehensive analysis indicated the optimal replacement rates of the four active fillers [steel slag powder (SSP), CCSP, slag powder (SP), and OPC] were 30%, 60%, 15%, and 60%, respectively. The results of microscopic tests revealed that the surface morphology and oxide mineral content of active fillers were more complex than those of LMP, which supported their ability to effectively absorb light oils from the asphalt on the granite aggregate surface and displace low-valent cations on the granite surface, thereby improving the state of the asphalt mastic–granite interface.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jmcee7.mteng-18255
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Active Filler on the Interfacial Adhesion between Granite Aggregate and Asphalt Mastic: Investigation of the Mechanism

Junqing Tan, Zhengqi Zhang, Jianbo Shao, Wei Lu et al.
6 citations
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
1.57
article

Effect of Active Filler on the Interfacial Adhesion between Granite Aggregate and Asphalt Mastic: Investigation of the Mechanism

Junqing Tan, Zhengqi Zhang, Jianbo Shao, Wei Lu, Xu Jiang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

To investigate the characteristics and mechanism of fillers’ influence on the interfacial adhesion properties between asphalt mastic and granite aggregate, four kinds of active fillers were selected to replace limestone mineral powder (LMP) in four proportions. Firstly, composite asphalt mastic (CAM) was prepared, and the adhesion property of the interface between different asphalt mastic and granite aggregate was evaluated based on the surface free energy (SFE). The optimum replacement rates were recommended by immersion Marshall tests and freeze–thaw splitting tests, and the water-temperature durability performance of granite asphalt mixtures under different treatment measures was verified by Hamburg rutting tests. Microproperty tests were carried out to analyze the effect of fillers on interfacial adhesion properties and mechanisms. The results showed that the alkaline minerals in the active fillers increased the Lewis base fraction of the asphalt mastic, which enhanced the SFE of the mastic. The maximum increase of the energy ratio (ER) with calcium carbide slag powder (CCSP) was 17%, and its enhancement of interfacial adhesion performance exceeded that of the other three active fillers. In addition, at the 60% replacement rate, CCSP improved MS0 and freeze-thaw split test strength ratio (TSR) by 9% and 15%, respectively, which exceeded the improvements from using OPC (7% and 14%, respectively). Comprehensive analysis indicated the optimal replacement rates of the four active fillers [steel slag powder (SSP), CCSP, slag powder (SP), and OPC] were 30%, 60%, 15%, and 60%, respectively. The results of microscopic tests revealed that the surface morphology and oxide mineral content of active fillers were more complex than those of LMP, which supported their ability to effectively absorb light oils from the asphalt on the granite aggregate surface and displace low-valent cations on the granite surface, thereby improving the state of the asphalt mastic–granite interface.

Journal of Materials in Civil EngineeringVol. 37(2)
Tangshan College (CN), Chang'an University (CN), Anhui Transport Consulting & Design Institute (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
1.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.