The compatibility of psychological research and machine learning analysis based on theoretical frameworks

The use of supervised machine learning in psychological and psychiatric research has been rapidly increasing in recent years, offering significant advantages over traditional statistical methods, particularly in developing models from sample data to enhance predictions on independent test datasets. Machine learning also provides access to sophisticated statistical algorithms and allows for the empirical selection of a smaller subset of predictor variables. However, many researchers often rely on a large number of predictors without utilizing theoretical frameworks to inform their selections, which can elevate the risks of Type I errors, increase false positives, and diminish the generalizability of findings. To address this, it is crucial to incorporate theory into the research process in psychology. We examine how theory can guide variable selection and data analysis in psychological research utilizing machine learning, providing recommendations for integrating theory into the machine learning framework. For instance, in cyberpsychology, we demonstrate how a theoretical framework can inform the selection of predictor variables, enhancing the robustness and interpretability of the model. This approach not only mitigates the risk of spurious results but also ensures that research outcomes are closely aligned with established psychological theories. In summary, while machine learning offers powerful tools for data analysis, its application in psychology requires careful theoretical guidance to avoid common pitfalls and yield meaningful, generalizable insights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icbase63199.2024.10762292
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The compatibility of psychological research and machine learning analysis based on theoretical frameworks

Jie Zhou, Shaojun Shi
Mental Health Research Topics
article

The compatibility of psychological research and machine learning analysis based on theoretical frameworks

Jie Zhou, Shaojun Shi
article en

Abstract

The use of supervised machine learning in psychological and psychiatric research has been rapidly increasing in recent years, offering significant advantages over traditional statistical methods, particularly in developing models from sample data to enhance predictions on independent test datasets. Machine learning also provides access to sophisticated statistical algorithms and allows for the empirical selection of a smaller subset of predictor variables. However, many researchers often rely on a large number of predictors without utilizing theoretical frameworks to inform their selections, which can elevate the risks of Type I errors, increase false positives, and diminish the generalizability of findings. To address this, it is crucial to incorporate theory into the research process in psychology. We examine how theory can guide variable selection and data analysis in psychological research utilizing machine learning, providing recommendations for integrating theory into the machine learning framework. For instance, in cyberpsychology, we demonstrate how a theoretical framework can inform the selection of predictor variables, enhancing the robustness and interpretability of the model. This approach not only mitigates the risk of spurious results but also ensures that research outcomes are closely aligned with established psychological theories. In summary, while machine learning offers powerful tools for data analysis, its application in psychology requires careful theoretical guidance to avoid common pitfalls and yield meaningful, generalizable insights.

Sany (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.