Legal Judgement Prediction via Contrastive Learning Based-Retrieval and Semantic Embedding

Legal judgment prediction is a significant task in Legal Artificial Intelligence, aiming to predict judgment results based on fact descriptions automatically. The judgment output may include law articles, charges, prison terms, or combinations. Relevant legal cases with similar backgrounds or events should likewise be considered essential references for judgment, as they play an indispensable role in evaluating the prediction task. However, when applied to Chinese legal data, current methodologies often neglect the specialized preprocessing required for unique semantic attributes of Chinese, which affects their prediction performance. This paper proposes a novel contrastive learning- based model for legal judgment prediction named CLR-LJP to improve prediction performance. According to the legal judgment process in real life, law article prediction is converted as a multi- label classification task that includes both relative law cases and law articles. The CLR-LJP firstly converts fact descriptions, law articles, and charges into vectors by embedding Chinese semantics. Then, contrastive learning is introduced in retrieval training to distinguish the similar content of different label definitions. Finally, the role embedding method is applied to learn the interactions among multiple law articles to predict prison terms. Experiment results indicate that our CLR-LJP model achieves the best performance compared to the state-of-the-art models, especially in the task of prison term prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ispce-asia64773.2024.10756244
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Judgement Prediction via Contrastive Learning Based-Retrieval and Semantic Embedding

Qixuan Zhang, Tianyong Hao, Cong Wei, Yanling Wang et al.
1 citations
Artificial Intelligence in Law
2.23
article

Legal Judgement Prediction via Contrastive Learning Based-Retrieval and Semantic Embedding

Qixuan Zhang, Tianyong Hao, Cong Wei, Yanling Wang, Juan Xu, Zhenhua Huang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Legal judgment prediction is a significant task in Legal Artificial Intelligence, aiming to predict judgment results based on fact descriptions automatically. The judgment output may include law articles, charges, prison terms, or combinations. Relevant legal cases with similar backgrounds or events should likewise be considered essential references for judgment, as they play an indispensable role in evaluating the prediction task. However, when applied to Chinese legal data, current methodologies often neglect the specialized preprocessing required for unique semantic attributes of Chinese, which affects their prediction performance. This paper proposes a novel contrastive learning- based model for legal judgment prediction named CLR-LJP to improve prediction performance. According to the legal judgment process in real life, law article prediction is converted as a multi- label classification task that includes both relative law cases and law articles. The CLR-LJP firstly converts fact descriptions, law articles, and charges into vectors by embedding Chinese semantics. Then, contrastive learning is introduced in retrieval training to distinguish the similar content of different label definitions. Finally, the role embedding method is applied to learn the interactions among multiple law articles to predict prison terms. Experiment results indicate that our CLR-LJP model achieves the best performance compared to the state-of-the-art models, especially in the task of prison term prediction.

South China Normal University (CN), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.