Asymmetric polarization by vaccination status identification during the COVID-19 pandemic

COVID-19 prevention measures and vaccine policies have led to substantial polarization across the world. I investigate whether and how vaccination status and vaccination status identification affect the sympathy and prejudice for vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Drawing on a preregistered vignette survey experiment in a large representative sample from Germany (n = 6,100) in December 2021, I show that prejudice was greater among the vaccinated towards the unvaccinated than vice versa. Furthermore, I find that differences in sympathy ratings are strongly subject to vaccination status identification. If individuals do not identify with their vaccination status, there are no differences in the evaluation of the in- and outgroups. Stronger vaccination status identification is, however, associated with greater prejudice among the vaccinated towards the unvaccinated but not for the unvaccinated towards the vaccinated. The results therefore show a stronger polarization on the side of the vaccinated that increases with the identification of one's vaccination status.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311962
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Asymmetric polarization by vaccination status identification during the COVID-19 pandemic

Sebastian Jungkunz
2 citations
PLoS ONE
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
1.06
article

Asymmetric polarization by vaccination status identification during the COVID-19 pandemic

Sebastian Jungkunz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

COVID-19 prevention measures and vaccine policies have led to substantial polarization across the world. I investigate whether and how vaccination status and vaccination status identification affect the sympathy and prejudice for vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Drawing on a preregistered vignette survey experiment in a large representative sample from Germany (n = 6,100) in December 2021, I show that prejudice was greater among the vaccinated towards the unvaccinated than vice versa. Furthermore, I find that differences in sympathy ratings are strongly subject to vaccination status identification. If individuals do not identify with their vaccination status, there are no differences in the evaluation of the in- and outgroups. Stronger vaccination status identification is, however, associated with greater prejudice among the vaccinated towards the unvaccinated but not for the unvaccinated towards the vaccinated. The results therefore show a stronger polarization on the side of the vaccinated that increases with the identification of one's vaccination status.

PLoS ONEVol. 19(11)
University of Bonn (DE), University of Bamberg (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Ministerium für Kultur und Wissenschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
1.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Asymmetric polarization by vaccination status identification during the COVID-19 pandemic — Sebastian Jungkunz · PLoS ONE (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS