Navigating a Post-Dobbs Era: Repercussions Faced by Marginalized Communities and the Future of Reproductive Justice

In June 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned Roe v. Wade, revoking the federal protection of the right to receive an abortion, and leaving abortion policymaking to state legislatures. Approximately thirteen states have already enforced abortion bans as of April 2023, while some states are still struggling with legal challenges of the ban. Across the U.S., individuals with the capacity for pregnancy are left without legal protection to such a necessary medical procedure. However, abortion access is only the surface of what is taken away from pregnant people with the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Exacerbated by race, class, and location of residence, pregnant people face major health, socioeconomic, and social losses that ultimately contribute to a poorer quality of life and overall setback in the movement towards reproductive justice. This paper explores the effects of the Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, by examining the realities of marginalized groups through the lenses of social welfare, public health, politics, and reproductive justice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Berkeley Undergraduate Journal
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5070/b3.36703
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating a Post-Dobbs Era: Repercussions Faced by Marginalized Communities and the Future of Reproductive Justice

Alyssa Mae Catipon Legaspi
Berkeley Undergraduate Journal
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Navigating a Post-Dobbs Era: Repercussions Faced by Marginalized Communities and the Future of Reproductive Justice

Alyssa Mae Catipon Legaspi
article en

Abstract

In June 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned Roe v. Wade, revoking the federal protection of the right to receive an abortion, and leaving abortion policymaking to state legislatures. Approximately thirteen states have already enforced abortion bans as of April 2023, while some states are still struggling with legal challenges of the ban. Across the U.S., individuals with the capacity for pregnancy are left without legal protection to such a necessary medical procedure. However, abortion access is only the surface of what is taken away from pregnant people with the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Exacerbated by race, class, and location of residence, pregnant people face major health, socioeconomic, and social losses that ultimately contribute to a poorer quality of life and overall setback in the movement towards reproductive justice. This paper explores the effects of the Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, by examining the realities of marginalized groups through the lenses of social welfare, public health, politics, and reproductive justice.

Berkeley Undergraduate JournalVol. 38(1)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.