A Geotechnical Centrifuge Study on the Bearing Capacity of Ring Foundations Reinforced by Stone Columns

Ring foundations are a distinct category of shallow foundations designed for the bearing loads of symmetrical structures with circular planes, such as bridge piers, liquid storage tanks, and wind turbines. In this study, six geotechnical centrifuge models were tested to simulate the performance of ring foundations supported by stone columns over loose sandy silt. The effects of column length (L) and diameter (D) on bearing capacity were evaluated by testing values of L/D at 6, 8, and 10. Furthermore, three different arrangements of columns including triangular, square, and annular were considered, and also the load–settlement behavior of the ring foundation was examined. The optimal L/D ratio and the most effective type of column arrangement were determined. The ultimate bearing capacity (qult), the coefficient of subgrade reaction (ks), and Young’s modulus (Es) of the soil layer were also analyzed. The experimental qult of the ring foundation with a rough base, situated on an unreinforced soil layer, and aligned with the analytical formulations for qult was found in previous studies. The results indicated that the use of the annular arrangement of stone columns with L/D = 8 increased the bearing capacity by 2.8 times and the values of ks and E by approximately 3.4 times as compared with the unreinforced case. According to observations, the bulging failure mode governed stone column groups at a depth of 2D to 2.5D from their heads, while the soil layer failed because of the general shear mechanism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Geomechanics
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/ijgnai.gmeng-9948
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Geotechnical Centrifuge Study on the Bearing Capacity of Ring Foundations Reinforced by Stone Columns

Ali Ghanbari, Sasan Amirafshari
International Journal of Geomechanics
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

A Geotechnical Centrifuge Study on the Bearing Capacity of Ring Foundations Reinforced by Stone Columns

Ali Ghanbari, Sasan Amirafshari
article en

Abstract

Ring foundations are a distinct category of shallow foundations designed for the bearing loads of symmetrical structures with circular planes, such as bridge piers, liquid storage tanks, and wind turbines. In this study, six geotechnical centrifuge models were tested to simulate the performance of ring foundations supported by stone columns over loose sandy silt. The effects of column length (L) and diameter (D) on bearing capacity were evaluated by testing values of L/D at 6, 8, and 10. Furthermore, three different arrangements of columns including triangular, square, and annular were considered, and also the load–settlement behavior of the ring foundation was examined. The optimal L/D ratio and the most effective type of column arrangement were determined. The ultimate bearing capacity (qult), the coefficient of subgrade reaction (ks), and Young’s modulus (Es) of the soil layer were also analyzed. The experimental qult of the ring foundation with a rough base, situated on an unreinforced soil layer, and aligned with the analytical formulations for qult was found in previous studies. The results indicated that the use of the annular arrangement of stone columns with L/D = 8 increased the bearing capacity by 2.8 times and the values of ks and E by approximately 3.4 times as compared with the unreinforced case. According to observations, the bulging failure mode governed stone column groups at a depth of 2D to 2.5D from their heads, while the soil layer failed because of the general shear mechanism.

International Journal of GeomechanicsVol. 25(1)
Kharazmi University (IR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.