Interactions Between [PdX<sub>4</sub>]<sup>2−</sup> (X=Cl, Br) Dianions in Presence of Counterions

The interaction between two square palladium (II) dianions PdX<sub>4</sub> <sup>2-</sup> (X=Cl, Br) is evaluated by crystal study and analyzed by quantum chemical means. The arrangement within the crystal between each pair of PdX<sub>4</sub> <sup>2-</sup> neighbors is suggestive of a Pd⋅⋅⋅X noncovalent bond, which is verified by a battery of computational protocols. While the potential between these two bare dianions is computed to be highly repulsive, the introduction of even just two counterions makes this interaction attractive, as does the presence of a constellation of point charges. It is concluded that there is indeed a stabilizing Pd⋅⋅⋅X bond, but it is incapable of overcoming the strong coulombic repulsive force between two dianions. While the QTAIM, NBO, and NCI tools can indicate the presence of a noncovalent bond, they are unable to distinguish an attractive from a repulsive interaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemPhysChem
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202400712
Primary Topic
Magnetism in coordination complexes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interactions Between [PdX4]2− (X=Cl, Br) Dianions in Presence of Counterions

Rafał Wysokiński, Nabil Zouari, Mariusz Michalczyk, Fadhel Hajlaoui et al.
ChemPhysChem
Magnetism in coordination complexes
article

Interactions Between [PdX4]2− (X=Cl, Br) Dianions in Presence of Counterions

Rafał Wysokiński, Nabil Zouari, Mariusz Michalczyk, Fadhel Hajlaoui, Wiktor Zierkiewicz, Steve Scheiner, Natasza Trzęsowska
article en

Abstract

The interaction between two square palladium (II) dianions PdX<sub>4</sub> <sup>2-</sup> (X=Cl, Br) is evaluated by crystal study and analyzed by quantum chemical means. The arrangement within the crystal between each pair of PdX<sub>4</sub> <sup>2-</sup> neighbors is suggestive of a Pd⋅⋅⋅X noncovalent bond, which is verified by a battery of computational protocols. While the potential between these two bare dianions is computed to be highly repulsive, the introduction of even just two counterions makes this interaction attractive, as does the presence of a constellation of point charges. It is concluded that there is indeed a stabilizing Pd⋅⋅⋅X bond, but it is incapable of overcoming the strong coulombic repulsive force between two dianions. While the QTAIM, NBO, and NCI tools can indicate the presence of a noncovalent bond, they are unable to distinguish an attractive from a repulsive interaction.

ChemPhysChemVol. 26(5)
Wrocław University of Science and Technology (PL), Utah State University (US), University of Sfax (TN), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Magnetism in coordination complexes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Interactions Between [PdX<sub>4</sub>]<sup>2−</sup> (X=Cl, Br) Dianions in Presence of Counterions — Rafał Wysokiński, Nabil Zouari, et al. · ChemPhysChem (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS