Improved Peak Dilatancy Angle for Shear Strength Criteria of Sawtooth Rock Joints

The shear strength criterion for sawtooth joints, which considers only the shear contribution of inclination angle and ignores the effect of height difference, requires improvement. Direct shear tests based on Bahaddini’s numerical model were conducted on sawtooth joints with the same apparent inclination angle but different undulating heights. A comparative analysis of the measured peak shear strength with the predictions from typical shear strength criteria [Patton and Ladanyi and Archambault (L&A) criteria] revealed that these criteria actually estimate the shear strength of the sawtooth joint at the maximum undulating height corresponding to the apparent inclination angle. Then, an average slope angle ih was proposed to characterize the roughness differences between joints at the maximum undulating height and those below the maximum undulating height. Subtracting ih from the apparent inclination angle provided an improved peak dilatancy angle for the shear strength criterion of sawtooth rock joints. Validation results revealed that the average prediction error decreases from 145% to 21% for the Patton criterion and from 29% to 11% for the L&A criterion. To verify the revised criteria, 48 groups of sawtooth joints were tested in the laboratory. The results showed that the accuracy improved by 47.41% for the Patton criterion and 51.92% for the L&A criterion. Additionally, 22 published shear test data sets of sawtooth joints were collected to further verify the revised criteria. It was observed that the revised criteria have a better prediction performance, with root-mean-square errors of 2.036 and 0.927 for the revised Patton and L&A criteria, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Geomechanics
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/ijgnai.gmeng-9646
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved Peak Dilatancy Angle for Shear Strength Criteria of Sawtooth Rock Joints

Chenjie Hong, Zhigang Tao, Man Huang, Zhanyou Luo et al.
3 citations
International Journal of Geomechanics
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
0.81
article

Improved Peak Dilatancy Angle for Shear Strength Criteria of Sawtooth Rock Joints

Chenjie Hong, Zhigang Tao, Man Huang, Zhanyou Luo, Caijun Shao, Kai Wang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The shear strength criterion for sawtooth joints, which considers only the shear contribution of inclination angle and ignores the effect of height difference, requires improvement. Direct shear tests based on Bahaddini’s numerical model were conducted on sawtooth joints with the same apparent inclination angle but different undulating heights. A comparative analysis of the measured peak shear strength with the predictions from typical shear strength criteria [Patton and Ladanyi and Archambault (L&A) criteria] revealed that these criteria actually estimate the shear strength of the sawtooth joint at the maximum undulating height corresponding to the apparent inclination angle. Then, an average slope angle ih was proposed to characterize the roughness differences between joints at the maximum undulating height and those below the maximum undulating height. Subtracting ih from the apparent inclination angle provided an improved peak dilatancy angle for the shear strength criterion of sawtooth rock joints. Validation results revealed that the average prediction error decreases from 145% to 21% for the Patton criterion and from 29% to 11% for the L&A criterion. To verify the revised criteria, 48 groups of sawtooth joints were tested in the laboratory. The results showed that the accuracy improved by 47.41% for the Patton criterion and 51.92% for the L&A criterion. Additionally, 22 published shear test data sets of sawtooth joints were collected to further verify the revised criteria. It was observed that the revised criteria have a better prediction performance, with root-mean-square errors of 2.036 and 0.927 for the revised Patton and L&A criteria, respectively.

International Journal of GeomechanicsVol. 25(1)
Ningbo University (CN), Shaoxing University (CN), China University of Mining and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.