Digital Dignity: The Shibboleth of Digitalization in Europe?

This article analyses the uses to which ‘dignity’ is put in regulating and conceptualising our digital era. It considers the example of Europe, and particularly the European Union’s uses of dignity in policy-making and regulatory innovation in the digital context. More generally, it considers the normative scope and significance of dignity as it adapts to novel challenges to agency and vulnerability, and to changing public and private spheres. It concludes that, while ambiguous, dignity offers a powerful principle for articulating present and future challenges for a digital era. Other norms may be less ambiguous or more attractive as principles around which to build a body of jurisprudence, but dignity remains a crucial discourse for connecting micro and macro concerns about regulation and lived experience, as well as for connecting concerns about autonomy and embodiment as these continue to be transformed in a digital epoch.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law Technology and Humans
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.3547
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Dignity: The Shibboleth of Digitalization in Europe?

Stephen Riley, Cemre Çise Kadıoğlu Kumtepe
2 citations
Law Technology and Humans
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
2.26
article

Digital Dignity: The Shibboleth of Digitalization in Europe?

Stephen Riley, Cemre Çise Kadıoğlu Kumtepe
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article analyses the uses to which ‘dignity’ is put in regulating and conceptualising our digital era. It considers the example of Europe, and particularly the European Union’s uses of dignity in policy-making and regulatory innovation in the digital context. More generally, it considers the normative scope and significance of dignity as it adapts to novel challenges to agency and vulnerability, and to changing public and private spheres. It concludes that, while ambiguous, dignity offers a powerful principle for articulating present and future challenges for a digital era. Other norms may be less ambiguous or more attractive as principles around which to build a body of jurisprudence, but dignity remains a crucial discourse for connecting micro and macro concerns about regulation and lived experience, as well as for connecting concerns about autonomy and embodiment as these continue to be transformed in a digital epoch.

Law Technology and HumansVol. 6(3)
University of Leicester (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.