Outcomes of minimally invasive and open prophylactic gastrectomy for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer

Background: Mutations in the CDH1 gene predispose individuals to hereditary diffuse gastric cancer.As these tumors can evade endoscopic screening, prophylactic total gastrectomy is often recommended.Since skill with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has progressed, we compared CDH1 mutation carriers who underwent open vs MIS total gastrectomy.Methods: A retrospective review of 48 CDH1 carriers who underwent total gastrectomy from May 2004 to April 2023 was performed.Eight patients were excluded because they were symptomatic prior to surgery and had advanced signet ring cell adenocarcinoma.Results: Twenty-eight open and 12 MIS total gastrectomy patients were included; one MIS case was converted to open.The groups were comparable regarding age, comorbidities, and pre-operative carcinoma identified (42 % vs 36 %).Blood loss was lower with MIS gastrectomy (200 vs 23 mL) while operative time was longer (163 vs 286 minutes).The number of lymph nodes harvested (18 vs 23) and the percentage with carcinoma (86 % vs 92 %) were not different between open and MIS approaches.Length of stay was shorter after MIS gastrectomy (7 vs 5 days).In the MIS group, there were no major post-operative complications (2.5 % open) or readmissions within 90 days (11 % open).Subsequent surgery or dilation was infrequent (18 % vs 8 %).Less weight loss was seen after MIS gastrectomy, reaching significance at 9 months post-operatively (-25 % vs -13 %).Conclusions: MIS total gastrectomy is the preferred operation for CDH1 carriers, resulting in shorter hospitalization without compromising pathology or safety.Synopsis: Minimally invasive total gastrectomy performed for patients with CDH1 mutations has minimal shortor long-term complications and was associated with shorter length of stay and less weight loss than open total gastrectomy, without compromising lymph node yield or margin status.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Oncology Insight
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soi.2024.100112
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes of minimally invasive and open prophylactic gastrectomy for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer

Byrne Lee, Daniel Delitto, Sara K. Daniel, Deshka S. Foster et al.
Surgical Oncology Insight
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Outcomes of minimally invasive and open prophylactic gastrectomy for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer

Byrne Lee, Daniel Delitto, Sara K. Daniel, Deshka S. Foster, Amanda Kirane, Monica M. Dua, M. Usman Ahmad, Jeffrey A. Norton, George A. Poultsides, Brendan C. Visser, Joseph D. Forrester
article en

Abstract

Background: Mutations in the CDH1 gene predispose individuals to hereditary diffuse gastric cancer.As these tumors can evade endoscopic screening, prophylactic total gastrectomy is often recommended.Since skill with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has progressed, we compared CDH1 mutation carriers who underwent open vs MIS total gastrectomy.Methods: A retrospective review of 48 CDH1 carriers who underwent total gastrectomy from May 2004 to April 2023 was performed.Eight patients were excluded because they were symptomatic prior to surgery and had advanced signet ring cell adenocarcinoma.Results: Twenty-eight open and 12 MIS total gastrectomy patients were included; one MIS case was converted to open.The groups were comparable regarding age, comorbidities, and pre-operative carcinoma identified (42 % vs 36 %).Blood loss was lower with MIS gastrectomy (200 vs 23 mL) while operative time was longer (163 vs 286 minutes).The number of lymph nodes harvested (18 vs 23) and the percentage with carcinoma (86 % vs 92 %) were not different between open and MIS approaches.Length of stay was shorter after MIS gastrectomy (7 vs 5 days).In the MIS group, there were no major post-operative complications (2.5 % open) or readmissions within 90 days (11 % open).Subsequent surgery or dilation was infrequent (18 % vs 8 %).Less weight loss was seen after MIS gastrectomy, reaching significance at 9 months post-operatively (-25 % vs -13 %).Conclusions: MIS total gastrectomy is the preferred operation for CDH1 carriers, resulting in shorter hospitalization without compromising pathology or safety.Synopsis: Minimally invasive total gastrectomy performed for patients with CDH1 mutations has minimal shortor long-term complications and was associated with shorter length of stay and less weight loss than open total gastrectomy, without compromising lymph node yield or margin status.

Surgical Oncology InsightVol. 2(1)
Stanford University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.