Stage Motion Control: Nonlinear Integrators Revisited

Linear integrators are well known for their ability to counter static forces and improve low-frequency disturbance rejection properties in control systems. However, linear integrators introduce phase lag, which is a frequency-dependent time shift or delay. Since the early introduction of the Clegg integrator, nonlinear integrators have held the promise of providing phase advantages over linear integrators when evaluated from the perspective of a describing function. This could potentially reduce delay and therefore provide the means to surpass linear design limitations; for example, overshoot and settling times can be reduced or even avoided. In addition, loop gains can be increased, which improves the low-frequency disturbance rejection properties. For five nonlinear integrators—the Clegg integrator, a generalized first-order reset integrator called the constant-in-gain–lead-in-phase (CgLp) element, a hybrid integrator–gain system, a variable gain integrator, and a split-path integrator—this article provides a comparison and overview of recent developments in stage motion control. Benchmark examples are taken from the industrial practice of wafer scanners, which form the pivotal machines used in the manufacturing of computer chips.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Control Robotics and Autonomous Systems
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-control-030323-024047
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stage Motion Control: Nonlinear Integrators Revisited

S.J.A.M. van den Eijnden, Marcel Heertjes, Thomas P. Hoogeveen
1 citations
Annual Review of Control Robotics and Autonomous Systems
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
0.33
article

Stage Motion Control: Nonlinear Integrators Revisited

S.J.A.M. van den Eijnden, Marcel Heertjes, Thomas P. Hoogeveen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Linear integrators are well known for their ability to counter static forces and improve low-frequency disturbance rejection properties in control systems. However, linear integrators introduce phase lag, which is a frequency-dependent time shift or delay. Since the early introduction of the Clegg integrator, nonlinear integrators have held the promise of providing phase advantages over linear integrators when evaluated from the perspective of a describing function. This could potentially reduce delay and therefore provide the means to surpass linear design limitations; for example, overshoot and settling times can be reduced or even avoided. In addition, loop gains can be increased, which improves the low-frequency disturbance rejection properties. For five nonlinear integrators—the Clegg integrator, a generalized first-order reset integrator called the constant-in-gain–lead-in-phase (CgLp) element, a hybrid integrator–gain system, a variable gain integrator, and a split-path integrator—this article provides a comparison and overview of recent developments in stage motion control. Benchmark examples are taken from the industrial practice of wafer scanners, which form the pivotal machines used in the manufacturing of computer chips.

Annual Review of Control Robotics and Autonomous SystemsVol. 8(1)
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL), ASML (Netherlands) (NL)
Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stage Motion Control: Nonlinear Integrators Revisited — S.J.A.M. van den Eijnden, Marcel Heertjes, et al. · Annual Review of Control Robotics and Autonomous Systems (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS