Cost benefit analysis and carbon footprint of biogas energy through life cycle assessment

Biogas is a kind of renewable energy resource and can be burned to produce electricity and heat. If methane is released directly into the air, it would be a very serious source of GHG emissions. Therefore, capturing and recycling methane for power generation would not only significantly reduce industrial greenhouse gas emissions, but also reduce the need to purchase electricity. In addition, with the Net Zero in 2050 initiative and circular economy, more academic and industry research investigate the biogas energy. However, the cost and carbon footprint of biogas energy is varied with the technologies. In this research, the As-Is (biomass waste treatment) and To-Be (biomass waste to energy) model is compared. It shows it is worth to do the investment of bioenergy system for the farm to reduce the GHG emissions if the carbon tax is added. However, the cost of bioenergy facilities will influence the income. A case study is also illustrated to provide the biogas energy production for the government policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100240
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost benefit analysis and carbon footprint of biogas energy through life cycle assessment

M. C. J. Lin, Tsai‐Chi Kuo, Huijun Chen, Billy Chong
11 citations
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
2.26
article

Cost benefit analysis and carbon footprint of biogas energy through life cycle assessment

M. C. J. Lin, Tsai‐Chi Kuo, Huijun Chen, Billy Chong
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Biogas is a kind of renewable energy resource and can be burned to produce electricity and heat. If methane is released directly into the air, it would be a very serious source of GHG emissions. Therefore, capturing and recycling methane for power generation would not only significantly reduce industrial greenhouse gas emissions, but also reduce the need to purchase electricity. In addition, with the Net Zero in 2050 initiative and circular economy, more academic and industry research investigate the biogas energy. However, the cost and carbon footprint of biogas energy is varied with the technologies. In this research, the As-Is (biomass waste treatment) and To-Be (biomass waste to energy) model is compared. It shows it is worth to do the investment of bioenergy system for the farm to reduce the GHG emissions if the carbon tax is added. However, the cost of bioenergy facilities will influence the income. A case study is also illustrated to provide the biogas energy production for the government policy.

Cleaner Environmental SystemsVol. 15
Fu Jen Catholic University (TW), National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cost benefit analysis and carbon footprint of biogas energy through life cycle assessment — M. C. J. Lin, Tsai‐Chi Kuo, et al. · Cleaner Environmental Systems (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS