Machine learning the in-medium correction factor on nucleon–nucleon elastic cross section

Abstract The nuclear equation of state cannot be directly measured in the heavy-ion collision experiments; it is usually inferred from the comparison between transport model simulations and experimental measurements. The in-medium correction factor ( F , which is defined as the ratio of the cross section in the nuclear medium to that in free space) on the nucleon–nucleon elastic cross section is one of the important inputs of the transport model, and its magnitude is still debated. The advent of machine learning (ML) has profoundly influenced the way scientists study the natural world and has provided a new paradigm that merges traditional investigation with advanced data-driven techniques. The aim of this work is to present a ML-based method to study the in-medium correction factor F . The ultra-relativistic quantum molecular dynamics (UrQMD) transport model is used to simulate <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>132</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sn</mml:mi> </mml:math> + <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>124</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sn</mml:mi> </mml:math> collisions at beam energy of 0.27 GeV/nucleon with different impact parameters. The value of F is randomly selected from 0.4 to 0.8 for the simulation of each event. Several observables simulated by the UrQMD model with different F , which are thought to be probably sensitive to the in-medium nucleon–nucleon cross sections, are fed into the LightGBM (Light Gradient Boosting Machine, which is a modern decision tree-based ML algorithm) to establish the mapping between the observables and F . The mean absolute error (MAE), which is the absolute difference between the true and the predicted F , is about 0.080 and 0.021 by using event-by-event and 40-event summed observables, respectively. It indicates that ML can recognize information about the F factor. Furthermore, according to the results of Shapley Additive exPlanations, an interpretability analysis method in ML, features that have the greatest effect on the F are identified. ML combined with the transport model may open a new venue to study the F factor. In addition, the interpretability analysis of the ML algorithm may also offer valuable insights for subsequent research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ad975f
Citations
1
Primary Topic
High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning the in-medium correction factor on nucleon–nucleon elastic cross section

G. Wei, Qingfeng Li, Yongjia Wang, F. H. Liu et al.
1 citations
Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics
High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
0.66
article

Machine learning the in-medium correction factor on nucleon–nucleon elastic cross section

G. Wei, Qingfeng Li, Yongjia Wang, F. H. Liu, Pengcheng Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The nuclear equation of state cannot be directly measured in the heavy-ion collision experiments; it is usually inferred from the comparison between transport model simulations and experimental measurements. The in-medium correction factor ( F , which is defined as the ratio of the cross section in the nuclear medium to that in free space) on the nucleon–nucleon elastic cross section is one of the important inputs of the transport model, and its magnitude is still debated. The advent of machine learning (ML) has profoundly influenced the way scientists study the natural world and has provided a new paradigm that merges traditional investigation with advanced data-driven techniques. The aim of this work is to present a ML-based method to study the in-medium correction factor F . The ultra-relativistic quantum molecular dynamics (UrQMD) transport model is used to simulate <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>132</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sn</mml:mi> </mml:math> + <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>124</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sn</mml:mi> </mml:math> collisions at beam energy of 0.27 GeV/nucleon with different impact parameters. The value of F is randomly selected from 0.4 to 0.8 for the simulation of each event. Several observables simulated by the UrQMD model with different F , which are thought to be probably sensitive to the in-medium nucleon–nucleon cross sections, are fed into the LightGBM (Light Gradient Boosting Machine, which is a modern decision tree-based ML algorithm) to establish the mapping between the observables and F . The mean absolute error (MAE), which is the absolute difference between the true and the predicted F , is about 0.080 and 0.021 by using event-by-event and 40-event summed observables, respectively. It indicates that ML can recognize information about the F factor. Furthermore, according to the results of Shapley Additive exPlanations, an interpretability analysis method in ML, features that have the greatest effect on the F are identified. ML combined with the transport model may open a new venue to study the F factor. In addition, the interpretability analysis of the ML algorithm may also offer valuable insights for subsequent research.

Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle PhysicsVol. 52(1)
Shanxi University (CN), Huzhou Normal University (CN), Institute of Theoretical Physics (CN), Institute of Modern Physics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.