Articular cartilage regeneration with a microgel as a support biomaterial. A rabbit knee model

Articular cartilage has limited regenerative capacity, so focal lesions generate mechanical stress in the joint that induces an aggravation of the damage, which ultimately leads to osteoarthritis. We recently suggested the use of microgels at the site of the cartilage defect, as a support material, to generate a biomechanical environment where pluripotent cells differentiate towards the hyaline cartilage phenotype. Here we propose a chondral regeneration strategy based on subchondral bone injury, and filling the defect site with an agglomerate of two types of microspheres, some rigid made of a biodegradable polyester (40 μm mean diameter), and others with a gel consistency made of platelet-rich plasma obtained from circulating blood (70-110 μm diameter). A 3-mm diameter defect was made in the articular cartilage of the knee joint in rabbits, exposing the subchondral bone, in which incisions were made to produce bleeding. Microgels were implanted filling the defect, which was covered with a synthetic membrane of the same polyester. Three months later, cartilage regeneration was analyzed according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) guidelines. The newly formed tissue showed histological characteristics of hyaline cartilage, being significantly closer to native cartilage than when only the membrane was implanted, mainly in parameters such as tissue (70.0 ± 20.9) and cell morphologies (100.0 ± 0.0), and surface architecture (90.0 ± 22.4) and assessment (70.0 ± 11.2), with native tissue having a value of 100. Polyester microspheres and membrane were not bioreabsorbed during the three months, but rather moved towards the subchondral bone, leaving space for the organization of the newly formed tissue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomaterials Advances
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.214125
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Articular cartilage regeneration with a microgel as a support biomaterial. A rabbit knee model

Carmen Cardá, Javier Zurriaga Carda, Carmen M. Antolinos‐Turpín, Joaquín Ródenas‐Rochina et al.
2 citations
Biomaterials Advances
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
0.94
article

Articular cartilage regeneration with a microgel as a support biomaterial. A rabbit knee model

Carmen Cardá, Javier Zurriaga Carda, Carmen M. Antolinos‐Turpín, Joaquín Ródenas‐Rochina, Manuel Mata, Gloria Gallego Ferrer, Lara Milián, María Sancho‐Tello, José Luís Gómez Ribelles, Júlia Plá-Salom, Zakaria Oguir
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Articular cartilage has limited regenerative capacity, so focal lesions generate mechanical stress in the joint that induces an aggravation of the damage, which ultimately leads to osteoarthritis. We recently suggested the use of microgels at the site of the cartilage defect, as a support material, to generate a biomechanical environment where pluripotent cells differentiate towards the hyaline cartilage phenotype. Here we propose a chondral regeneration strategy based on subchondral bone injury, and filling the defect site with an agglomerate of two types of microspheres, some rigid made of a biodegradable polyester (40 μm mean diameter), and others with a gel consistency made of platelet-rich plasma obtained from circulating blood (70-110 μm diameter). A 3-mm diameter defect was made in the articular cartilage of the knee joint in rabbits, exposing the subchondral bone, in which incisions were made to produce bleeding. Microgels were implanted filling the defect, which was covered with a synthetic membrane of the same polyester. Three months later, cartilage regeneration was analyzed according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) guidelines. The newly formed tissue showed histological characteristics of hyaline cartilage, being significantly closer to native cartilage than when only the membrane was implanted, mainly in parameters such as tissue (70.0 ± 20.9) and cell morphologies (100.0 ± 0.0), and surface architecture (90.0 ± 22.4) and assessment (70.0 ± 11.2), with native tissue having a value of 100. Polyester microspheres and membrane were not bioreabsorbed during the three months, but rather moved towards the subchondral bone, leaving space for the organization of the newly formed tissue.

Biomaterials AdvancesVol. 168
Universitat de València (ES), Biomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (ES), INCLIVA Health Research Institute (ES), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
0.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.