Greenness assessment of exemplary US EPA and DIN standard analytical methods using the AGREEprep model

• Standard methods had the lowest greenness among the evaluated procedures. • Greener sample preparations existed at the time of publishing the standard method. • Liquid-phase microextraction could be greener than solid-phase alternatives. Sustainable development principles have become a common consensus and a challenge to humanity, shifting the societal focus towards greener alternatives. The chemical sector, in particular analytical chemistry tends to attain a leading role in this initiative as it strives to incorporate green chemistry principles when designing and proposing new chemical solutions. Sample preparation is considered a critical stage in an analytical procedure regarding waste generation and resource consumption. The main goal of this work was to evaluate the sample preparation greenness of selected analytical standard procedures. Accordingly, three reference methods from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA methods 523, 528, and 610) and one method from the German Institute for Standardization (DIN 38047–37), which use classical solid-phase and liquid-liquid extraction as the core of their sample preparation procedures, were evaluated via AGREEprep , a green metric tool designed specifically for evaluation of sample preparation greenness. In addition, the methods were compared with twenty novel analytical alternatives reported in the literature, including a variety of solid-phase and liquid-phase microextraction techniques. In all cases, the miniaturized sample preparation strategies showed superior greenness over the standard methods, while providing similar or better analytical performance. The main evidenced shortcomings of the standard methods were the large sample volume required for the extraction and the use of large volumes of organic solvents. The overall results confirmed that the shift toward green approaches for sample preparation integrating sustainable extraction protocols and greener methodologies has the potential to improve the environmental performance of the analytical method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Green Analytical Chemistry
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.greeac.2024.100180
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Greenness assessment of exemplary US EPA and DIN standard analytical methods using the AGREEprep model

Torsten C. Schmidt, Amir Salemi, Albana Luta
3 citations
Green Analytical Chemistry
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
1.05
article

Greenness assessment of exemplary US EPA and DIN standard analytical methods using the AGREEprep model

Torsten C. Schmidt, Amir Salemi, Albana Luta
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Standard methods had the lowest greenness among the evaluated procedures. • Greener sample preparations existed at the time of publishing the standard method. • Liquid-phase microextraction could be greener than solid-phase alternatives. Sustainable development principles have become a common consensus and a challenge to humanity, shifting the societal focus towards greener alternatives. The chemical sector, in particular analytical chemistry tends to attain a leading role in this initiative as it strives to incorporate green chemistry principles when designing and proposing new chemical solutions. Sample preparation is considered a critical stage in an analytical procedure regarding waste generation and resource consumption. The main goal of this work was to evaluate the sample preparation greenness of selected analytical standard procedures. Accordingly, three reference methods from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA methods 523, 528, and 610) and one method from the German Institute for Standardization (DIN 38047–37), which use classical solid-phase and liquid-liquid extraction as the core of their sample preparation procedures, were evaluated via AGREEprep , a green metric tool designed specifically for evaluation of sample preparation greenness. In addition, the methods were compared with twenty novel analytical alternatives reported in the literature, including a variety of solid-phase and liquid-phase microextraction techniques. In all cases, the miniaturized sample preparation strategies showed superior greenness over the standard methods, while providing similar or better analytical performance. The main evidenced shortcomings of the standard methods were the large sample volume required for the extraction and the use of large volumes of organic solvents. The overall results confirmed that the shift toward green approaches for sample preparation integrating sustainable extraction protocols and greener methodologies has the potential to improve the environmental performance of the analytical method.

Green Analytical ChemistryVol. 11
IWW Water Centre (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.