A Validation of the Korean Version of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders-Brief

This study aims to validate the Korean version of the SCARED-Brief, originally developed by Birmaher et al. (1999), by examining its psychometric properties, including reliability and validity. Data were obtained from 356 pairs of children with trauma experiences and their caregivers, as well as 533 adolescents. The psychometric evaluation indicated acceptable item properties, with confirmatory factor analysis supporting the good fit of a one-factor model. The internal consistency was excellent, with .83 for children, .87 for caregivers, and .79 for adolescents. Concurrent validity was established through significant positive correlations with measures of anxiety, depression, and PTSD. Furthermore, ROC curve analysis determined that a cutoff score of 3 or higher effectively discriminates between clinical and non-clinical groups. The study also identified a critical item for the scale's application in urgent clinical settings. The findings are discussed in terms of their implications and limitations, highlighting the scale's utility in both research and practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Association of Korea Counseling Psychology Education Welfare
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20496/cpew.2024.11.4.125
Primary Topic
Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Validation of the Korean Version of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders-Brief

Na-Bin LEE, Kisun Sim, Bo-Kyung Kim, Dohee Kim et al.
The Association of Korea Counseling Psychology Education Welfare
Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
article

A Validation of the Korean Version of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders-Brief

Na-Bin LEE, Kisun Sim, Bo-Kyung Kim, Dohee Kim, Hyesun Joo
article en

Abstract

This study aims to validate the Korean version of the SCARED-Brief, originally developed by Birmaher et al. (1999), by examining its psychometric properties, including reliability and validity. Data were obtained from 356 pairs of children with trauma experiences and their caregivers, as well as 533 adolescents. The psychometric evaluation indicated acceptable item properties, with confirmatory factor analysis supporting the good fit of a one-factor model. The internal consistency was excellent, with .83 for children, .87 for caregivers, and .79 for adolescents. Concurrent validity was established through significant positive correlations with measures of anxiety, depression, and PTSD. Furthermore, ROC curve analysis determined that a cutoff score of 3 or higher effectively discriminates between clinical and non-clinical groups. The study also identified a critical item for the scale's application in urgent clinical settings. The findings are discussed in terms of their implications and limitations, highlighting the scale's utility in both research and practice.

The Association of Korea Counseling Psychology Education WelfareVol. 11(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Validation of the Korean Version of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders-Brief — Na-Bin LEE, Kisun Sim, et al. · The Association of Korea Counseling Psychology Education Welfare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS