A study on detecting faking response using machine learning in a self-report psychological test

This study investigated methods for detecting faking responses in self-report psychological tests using machine learning techniques. Data were collected under both honest and deceptive conditions, and three algorithms—random forest, support vector machine, and artificial neural network—were applied for prediction. The results indicated that machine learning techniques, particularly artificial neural networks, were effective, achieving more accurate results compared to traditional methods using specific cutoff thresholds. These findings suggest that the choice of detection method may vary depending on the context of the psychological assessment. Furthermore, the study recommends combining machine learning and traditional approaches to enhance the detection of faking responses in psychological tests.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Association of Korea Counseling Psychology Education Welfare
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20496/cpew.2024.11.4.89
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A study on detecting faking response using machine learning in a self-report psychological test

Yujung Hong, J. T. Lee
The Association of Korea Counseling Psychology Education Welfare
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
article

A study on detecting faking response using machine learning in a self-report psychological test

Yujung Hong, J. T. Lee
article en

Abstract

This study investigated methods for detecting faking responses in self-report psychological tests using machine learning techniques. Data were collected under both honest and deceptive conditions, and three algorithms—random forest, support vector machine, and artificial neural network—were applied for prediction. The results indicated that machine learning techniques, particularly artificial neural networks, were effective, achieving more accurate results compared to traditional methods using specific cutoff thresholds. These findings suggest that the choice of detection method may vary depending on the context of the psychological assessment. Furthermore, the study recommends combining machine learning and traditional approaches to enhance the detection of faking responses in psychological tests.

The Association of Korea Counseling Psychology Education WelfareVol. 11(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.