Improved Probabilistic Seismic Demand–Intensity Relationship: Heteroscedastic Approaches

As an integral part of assessing the seismic performance of structures, the probabilistic seismic demand–intensity relationship has been widely studied. In this study, the phenomenon of heteroscedasticity in probabilistic seismic demand models was systematically investigated. A brief review of the definition, diagnosis, and conventional treatment of heteroscedasticity is presented herein, and based on that, two more generalized methods for both univariate and multivariate cases are proposed. For a typical four-span simply supported girder bridge, a series of nonlinear time history analyses were performed through multiple stripe analysis to determine its seismic demand and intensity, which can be employed as a sample set. For both univariate and multivariate cases, probabilistic seismic demand models were developed based on the two aforementioned methods under the Bayesian regression framework, and the fitted results were compared and analyzed with the conventional models using linear regression approaches. This approach forms the foundation for further developing seismic fragility modeling of both bridge component and system. The results show that in the presence of probabilistic seismic demand considering heteroscedasticity, the patterns of nonconstant variance or covariance can be characterized effectively, and a better-calibrated prediction region than that of homoscedastic models can be provided. Additionally, it offers a more comprehensive pathway for precise seismic fragility analysis. The causes of the heteroscedasticity phenomenon and subsequent solutions are thoroughly discussed. The analysis procedures can be further embedded in seismic risk and resilience assessment, thus providing a more accurate basis for aseismic decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A Civil Engineering
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/ajrua6.rueng-1420
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved Probabilistic Seismic Demand–Intensity Relationship: Heteroscedastic Approaches

Libo Chen
2 citations
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A Civil Engineering
Seismic Performance and Analysis
0.52
article

Improved Probabilistic Seismic Demand–Intensity Relationship: Heteroscedastic Approaches

Libo Chen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

As an integral part of assessing the seismic performance of structures, the probabilistic seismic demand–intensity relationship has been widely studied. In this study, the phenomenon of heteroscedasticity in probabilistic seismic demand models was systematically investigated. A brief review of the definition, diagnosis, and conventional treatment of heteroscedasticity is presented herein, and based on that, two more generalized methods for both univariate and multivariate cases are proposed. For a typical four-span simply supported girder bridge, a series of nonlinear time history analyses were performed through multiple stripe analysis to determine its seismic demand and intensity, which can be employed as a sample set. For both univariate and multivariate cases, probabilistic seismic demand models were developed based on the two aforementioned methods under the Bayesian regression framework, and the fitted results were compared and analyzed with the conventional models using linear regression approaches. This approach forms the foundation for further developing seismic fragility modeling of both bridge component and system. The results show that in the presence of probabilistic seismic demand considering heteroscedasticity, the patterns of nonconstant variance or covariance can be characterized effectively, and a better-calibrated prediction region than that of homoscedastic models can be provided. Additionally, it offers a more comprehensive pathway for precise seismic fragility analysis. The causes of the heteroscedasticity phenomenon and subsequent solutions are thoroughly discussed. The analysis procedures can be further embedded in seismic risk and resilience assessment, thus providing a more accurate basis for aseismic decision-making.

ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A Civil EngineeringVol. 11(1)
Fuzhou University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.