When is more actually better? expert opinions on assessment of situation awareness in relation to safe driving

• Increased situation awareness (SA) is often associated with safer driving. • A normative interpretation of SA in relation to safe driving is lacking. • Experts provide views on moving from relative to normative interpretations of SA. • The potential of an SA criterion for safe or unsafe driving is discussed. • Suggestions for the selection and weighting of SA requirements are presented. The use of situation awareness (SA) measures to assess relative safety in driving is common, with higher levels of SA being interpreted as safer. These relative interpretations do not allow researchers to determine whether the level of SA could be considered “safe” or “unsafe”. In contrast to such interpretations based on relative performance, the current position paper explores the potential for a normative interpretation of situation awareness with regard to safety assessment in driving. A series of expert interviews yielded viewpoints on the current relation between SA and safe driving, theoretical underpinnings for a normative approach, and potential actions towards an SA criterion for safe or unsafe driving. Methodological challenges regarding a normative approach are discussed together with considerations towards a weighted criterion-based approach to SA. The selection of SA requirements relevant for safety and the differentiation and weighting of these requirements on high and lower importance is presented. A method towards objective determination of relevance and weight of SA requirements may increase the usefulness of SA measures for assessment of safety in a driving context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2024.11.011
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When is more actually better? expert opinions on assessment of situation awareness in relation to safe driving

Reinier J. Jansen, Rins de Zwart, Mark S. Young, Joost de Winter et al.
2 citations
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
1.29
article

When is more actually better? expert opinions on assessment of situation awareness in relation to safe driving

Reinier J. Jansen, Rins de Zwart, Mark S. Young, Joost de Winter, Cheryl A. Bolstad, Mica R. Endsley, Petya Ventsislavova
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Increased situation awareness (SA) is often associated with safer driving. • A normative interpretation of SA in relation to safe driving is lacking. • Experts provide views on moving from relative to normative interpretations of SA. • The potential of an SA criterion for safe or unsafe driving is discussed. • Suggestions for the selection and weighting of SA requirements are presented. The use of situation awareness (SA) measures to assess relative safety in driving is common, with higher levels of SA being interpreted as safer. These relative interpretations do not allow researchers to determine whether the level of SA could be considered “safe” or “unsafe”. In contrast to such interpretations based on relative performance, the current position paper explores the potential for a normative interpretation of situation awareness with regard to safety assessment in driving. A series of expert interviews yielded viewpoints on the current relation between SA and safe driving, theoretical underpinnings for a normative approach, and potential actions towards an SA criterion for safe or unsafe driving. Methodological challenges regarding a normative approach are discussed together with considerations towards a weighted criterion-based approach to SA. The selection of SA requirements relevant for safety and the differentiation and weighting of these requirements on high and lower importance is presented. A method towards objective determination of relevance and weight of SA requirements may increase the usefulness of SA measures for assessment of safety in a driving context.

Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and BehaviourVol. 108
National Park Service (US), Instituto de Montañas (US), Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid (NL), University of Southampton (GB), Nottingham Trent University (GB), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.