Comparison of Cochet–Bonnet, Dental Floss, and Cotton Wisp With Applications to Corneal Sensation Testing
tnDF provides the best analog for the CB. CW provides a small amount of force over a large range of lengths and may be a useful screening tool. tkDF is less suitable for screening. CRS check corneal sensation at a higher rate than NCRS. CW was the most common method used in both groups.
Authors
- William G. Schultheis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8493-9343)
- Thomas H. Hampton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0543-402X)
- William G. Gensheimer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6637-5572)
Institutions
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cornea
- Published
- 2024-11-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000003763
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.09