Adoption and spatial distribution disparities of residential plug-in and rooftop photovoltaic systems in Germany

In contrast to residential rooftop photovoltaic systems, plug-in photovoltaic systems offer a significantly lower barrier to entry in terms of upfront costs, installation complexity, and the need for roof space. These attributes make them appealing to a wider demographic and position them as transformative tools in the energy transition, opening opportunities for broader participation in renewable energy and aligning with the growing emphasis on energy justice and inclusivity. Nevertheless, adoption patterns for plug-in PV systems are not well understood, especially given their unique characteristics, which limit the applicability of insights derived from residential rooftop systems. This study addresses this research gap by applying spatial econometric models to investigate plug-in PV system adoption, revealing pronounced disparities. Our findings show that income support recipients are less negatively associated with plug-in PV adoption compared to larger rooftop systems, indicating that the lower upfront costs of plug-in PV systems may reduce financial barriers. Furthermore, the influence of household income on adoption is weaker for plug-in systems, suggesting that these systems may be more accessible to lower-income households. Contrary to expectations, solar radiation plays a less significant role in the adoption of plug-in PV. Additionally, the negative effect of the proportion of rented apartments on adoption is less pronounced for plug-in systems, highlighting their suitability for renters. Regional subsidies have demonstrated a positive impact on plug-in PV adoption, further emphasizing the potential of targeted support programs. Our findings can equip policymakers with the necessary insights to formulate strategies promoting the uptake of plug-in PV systems. • First comparative study of plug-in PV and residential rooftop PV adoption. • Plug-in PV systems help reduce barriers to renewable energy adoption. • Plug-in PV is more favored by income support recipients and lower-income households.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115092
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adoption and spatial distribution disparities of residential plug-in and rooftop photovoltaic systems in Germany

Maximilian Heumann, Tobias Kraschewski, Michael H. Breitner
11 citations
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
12.45
article

Adoption and spatial distribution disparities of residential plug-in and rooftop photovoltaic systems in Germany

Maximilian Heumann, Tobias Kraschewski, Michael H. Breitner
article en
11 citations

Abstract

In contrast to residential rooftop photovoltaic systems, plug-in photovoltaic systems offer a significantly lower barrier to entry in terms of upfront costs, installation complexity, and the need for roof space. These attributes make them appealing to a wider demographic and position them as transformative tools in the energy transition, opening opportunities for broader participation in renewable energy and aligning with the growing emphasis on energy justice and inclusivity. Nevertheless, adoption patterns for plug-in PV systems are not well understood, especially given their unique characteristics, which limit the applicability of insights derived from residential rooftop systems. This study addresses this research gap by applying spatial econometric models to investigate plug-in PV system adoption, revealing pronounced disparities. Our findings show that income support recipients are less negatively associated with plug-in PV adoption compared to larger rooftop systems, indicating that the lower upfront costs of plug-in PV systems may reduce financial barriers. Furthermore, the influence of household income on adoption is weaker for plug-in systems, suggesting that these systems may be more accessible to lower-income households. Contrary to expectations, solar radiation plays a less significant role in the adoption of plug-in PV. Additionally, the negative effect of the proportion of rented apartments on adoption is less pronounced for plug-in systems, highlighting their suitability for renters. Regional subsidies have demonstrated a positive impact on plug-in PV adoption, further emphasizing the potential of targeted support programs. Our findings can equip policymakers with the necessary insights to formulate strategies promoting the uptake of plug-in PV systems. • First comparative study of plug-in PV and residential rooftop PV adoption. • Plug-in PV systems help reduce barriers to renewable energy adoption. • Plug-in PV is more favored by income support recipients and lower-income households.

Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVol. 209
Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
12.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.