Bounds and dualities of Type II Little String Theories

A bstract We explore the symmetry structure of Type II Little String Theories and their T-dualities. We construct these theories both from the bottom-up perspective starting with seed Superconformal Field Theories, and from the top-down using F-/M-theory. By exploiting anomaly inflow and unitarity of the LST worldsheet theory, we derive strong conditions on the possible 6D bulk theories and their flavor algebras. These constraints continue to apply if gravity is coupled to the theory. We also study the higher form symmetry structure of these theories and show how they get exchanged under T-duality. Finally, we comment on seemingly consistent bottom-up Little String Theories that cannot be constructed from the top-down approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep11(2024)149
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bounds and dualities of Type II Little String Theories

Fabian Ruehle, Florent Baume, Paul-Konstantin Oehlmann
3 citations
Journal of High Energy Physics
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
1.98
article

Bounds and dualities of Type II Little String Theories

Fabian Ruehle, Florent Baume, Paul-Konstantin Oehlmann
article en
3 citations

Abstract

A bstract We explore the symmetry structure of Type II Little String Theories and their T-dualities. We construct these theories both from the bottom-up perspective starting with seed Superconformal Field Theories, and from the top-down using F-/M-theory. By exploiting anomaly inflow and unitarity of the LST worldsheet theory, we derive strong conditions on the possible 6D bulk theories and their flavor algebras. These constraints continue to apply if gravity is coupled to the theory. We also study the higher form symmetry structure of these theories and show how they get exchanged under T-duality. Finally, we comment on seemingly consistent bottom-up Little String Theories that cannot be constructed from the top-down approach.

Journal of High Energy PhysicsVol. 2024(11)
Northeastern University (US), Universität Hamburg (DE), The NSF AI Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Fundamental Interactions (US), Universidad del Noreste (MX)
National Science Foundation, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
1.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bounds and dualities of Type II Little String Theories — Fabian Ruehle, Florent Baume, et al. · Journal of High Energy Physics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS