Four-class ASME BCI: investigation of the feasibility and comparison of two strategies for multiclassing

Introduction The ASME (stands for Auditory Stream segregation Multiclass ERP) paradigm is proposed and used for an auditory brain-computer interface (BCI). In this paradigm, a sequence of sounds that are perceived as multiple auditory streams are presented simultaneously, and each stream is an oddball sequence. The users are requested to focus selectively on deviant stimuli in one of the streams, and the target of the user attention is detected by decoding event-related potentials (ERPs). To achieve multiclass ASME BCI, the number of streams must be increased. However, increasing the number of streams is not easy because of a person's limited audible frequency range. One method to achieve multiclass ASME with a limited number of streams is to increase the target stimuli in a single stream. Methods Two approaches for the ASME paradigm, ASME-4stream (four streams with a single target stimulus in each stream) and ASME-2stream (two streams with two target stimuli in each stream) were investigated. Fifteen healthy subjects with no neurological disorders participated in this study. An electroencephalogram was acquired, and ERPs were analyzed. The binary classification and BCI simulation (detecting the target class of the trial out of four) were conducted with the help of linear discriminant analysis, and its performance was evaluated offline. Its usability and workload were also evaluated using a questionnaire. Results Discriminative ERPs were elicited in both paradigms. The average accuracies of the BCI simulations were 0.83 (ASME-4stream) and 0.86 (ASME-2stream). In the ASME-2stream paradigm, the latency and the amplitude of P300 were shorter and larger, the average binary classification accuracy was higher, and the average weighted workload was smaller. Discussion Both four-class ASME paradigms achieved a sufficiently high accuracy (over 80%). The shorter latency and larger amplitude of P300 and the smaller workload indicated that subjects could perform the task confidently and had high usability in ASME-2stream compared to ASME-4stream paradigm. A paradigm with multiple target stimuli in a single stream could create a multiclass ASME BCI with limited streams while maintaining task difficulty. These findings expand the potential for an ASME BCI multiclass extension, offering practical auditory BCI choices for users.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1461960
Citations
3
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Four-class ASME BCI: investigation of the feasibility and comparison of two strategies for multiclassing

Simon Kojima, Shin’ichiro Kanoh
3 citations
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
1.03
article

Four-class ASME BCI: investigation of the feasibility and comparison of two strategies for multiclassing

Simon Kojima, Shin’ichiro Kanoh
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Introduction The ASME (stands for Auditory Stream segregation Multiclass ERP) paradigm is proposed and used for an auditory brain-computer interface (BCI). In this paradigm, a sequence of sounds that are perceived as multiple auditory streams are presented simultaneously, and each stream is an oddball sequence. The users are requested to focus selectively on deviant stimuli in one of the streams, and the target of the user attention is detected by decoding event-related potentials (ERPs). To achieve multiclass ASME BCI, the number of streams must be increased. However, increasing the number of streams is not easy because of a person's limited audible frequency range. One method to achieve multiclass ASME with a limited number of streams is to increase the target stimuli in a single stream. Methods Two approaches for the ASME paradigm, ASME-4stream (four streams with a single target stimulus in each stream) and ASME-2stream (two streams with two target stimuli in each stream) were investigated. Fifteen healthy subjects with no neurological disorders participated in this study. An electroencephalogram was acquired, and ERPs were analyzed. The binary classification and BCI simulation (detecting the target class of the trial out of four) were conducted with the help of linear discriminant analysis, and its performance was evaluated offline. Its usability and workload were also evaluated using a questionnaire. Results Discriminative ERPs were elicited in both paradigms. The average accuracies of the BCI simulations were 0.83 (ASME-4stream) and 0.86 (ASME-2stream). In the ASME-2stream paradigm, the latency and the amplitude of P300 were shorter and larger, the average binary classification accuracy was higher, and the average weighted workload was smaller. Discussion Both four-class ASME paradigms achieved a sufficiently high accuracy (over 80%). The shorter latency and larger amplitude of P300 and the smaller workload indicated that subjects could perform the task confidently and had high usability in ASME-2stream compared to ASME-4stream paradigm. A paradigm with multiple target stimuli in a single stream could create a multiclass ASME BCI with limited streams while maintaining task difficulty. These findings expand the potential for an ASME BCI multiclass extension, offering practical auditory BCI choices for users.

Frontiers in Human NeuroscienceVol. 18
Shibaura Institute of Technology (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.