How to Use Simple Guidelines to Improve Both Beef Cattle Welfare and Sustainability: Lessons from the USA

Abstract Twenty-five years ago, a simple scoring system that used five outcome measures was used successfully in large slaughter plants to improve animal welfare. The outcome measures were insensibility, stunning efficacy, vocalization during handling, falling, and electric prod use. Two factors enabled this program to still be successful today. It was simple and easy to understand, and it was applied and enforced by large meat buyers. If a plant did not pass the audit, it could be removed from the approved supplier list. This provided a huge economic incentive to improve practices. For a commercial program to be effective, it must be simple so that auditors employed by buyers can be quickly trained. To make a simplified scoring system effective, the most important key indicators need to be determined. An effective key indicator will identify multiple problems that would severely compromise welfare. Two new problems have emerged relatively recently: Increased lameness in fed beef cattle and congestive heart failure. Both conditions severely compromise both welfare and sustainability. Congestive heart failure can cause the death of fed market-weight cattle shortly before slaughter. Both conditions can be easily assessed at the slaughter plant. Information © The Author 2024

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Science Cases
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1079/animalsciencecases.2024.0006
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to Use Simple Guidelines to Improve Both Beef Cattle Welfare and Sustainability: Lessons from the USA

Temple Grandin
Animal Science Cases
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
article

How to Use Simple Guidelines to Improve Both Beef Cattle Welfare and Sustainability: Lessons from the USA

Temple Grandin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Twenty-five years ago, a simple scoring system that used five outcome measures was used successfully in large slaughter plants to improve animal welfare. The outcome measures were insensibility, stunning efficacy, vocalization during handling, falling, and electric prod use. Two factors enabled this program to still be successful today. It was simple and easy to understand, and it was applied and enforced by large meat buyers. If a plant did not pass the audit, it could be removed from the approved supplier list. This provided a huge economic incentive to improve practices. For a commercial program to be effective, it must be simple so that auditors employed by buyers can be quickly trained. To make a simplified scoring system effective, the most important key indicators need to be determined. An effective key indicator will identify multiple problems that would severely compromise welfare. Two new problems have emerged relatively recently: Increased lameness in fed beef cattle and congestive heart failure. Both conditions severely compromise both welfare and sustainability. Congestive heart failure can cause the death of fed market-weight cattle shortly before slaughter. Both conditions can be easily assessed at the slaughter plant. Information © The Author 2024

Animal Science Cases
Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How to Use Simple Guidelines to Improve Both Beef Cattle Welfare and Sustainability: Lessons from the USA — Temple Grandin · Animal Science Cases (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS