Perspectives on the use of decellularized/devitalized and lyophilized human perinatal tissues for bone repair: Advantages and remaining challenges

Human amniotic membrane (hAM) has been extensively used for several decades as a bioactive scaffold for regenerative medicine. In its cryopreserved form-one of the main storage formats-the presence of viable cells has often been questioned. Furthermore, there is little published evidence of the role of endogenous amniotic cells from cryopreserved hAM in tissue repair. Some technologies, often patented and combined, have facilitated the use of hAM. Decellularization and devitalization processes have been developed to ensure its safety and prevent immune rejection. Lyophilization and dehydration methods have had a significant impact on clinical practices by enabling storage at room temperature in the operating room and making handling and cutting easier. Consequently, the commercialization of hAM has expanded, initially in the USA, and now in Europe. In the last decade, there has been growing interest in new perinatal tissues in clinical medicine. Similar processes have been adapted for these tissues to prevent immune or inflammatory reactions, and to improve storage and make them easier to use. For example, in the USA, many products marketed for wound healing undergo lyophilization, sometimes in combination with decellularization. Given our expertise, we wanted to highlight the potential of decellularized/devitalized and lyophilized perinatal tissues in regenerative medicine, particularly for bone repair. In this opinion paper, we discuss why these tissues represent the future of regenerative medicine, their potential drawbacks and strategies to overcome these challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials Today Bio
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101364
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives on the use of decellularized/devitalized and lyophilized human perinatal tissues for bone repair: Advantages and remaining challenges

Gianmarco Stati, Halima Kerdjoudj, Camille Gaudet, Lauriana Solecki et al.
6 citations
Materials Today Bio
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
3.44
article

Perspectives on the use of decellularized/devitalized and lyophilized human perinatal tissues for bone repair: Advantages and remaining challenges

Gianmarco Stati, Halima Kerdjoudj, Camille Gaudet, Lauriana Solecki, Thomas Gualdi, Jérémie Nallet, Mathilde Fénelon, Aurélien Louvrier, Roberta Di Pietro, Eugénie Bertin, Jessica Schiavi, Florelle Gindraux
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Human amniotic membrane (hAM) has been extensively used for several decades as a bioactive scaffold for regenerative medicine. In its cryopreserved form-one of the main storage formats-the presence of viable cells has often been questioned. Furthermore, there is little published evidence of the role of endogenous amniotic cells from cryopreserved hAM in tissue repair. Some technologies, often patented and combined, have facilitated the use of hAM. Decellularization and devitalization processes have been developed to ensure its safety and prevent immune rejection. Lyophilization and dehydration methods have had a significant impact on clinical practices by enabling storage at room temperature in the operating room and making handling and cutting easier. Consequently, the commercialization of hAM has expanded, initially in the USA, and now in Europe. In the last decade, there has been growing interest in new perinatal tissues in clinical medicine. Similar processes have been adapted for these tissues to prevent immune or inflammatory reactions, and to improve storage and make them easier to use. For example, in the USA, many products marketed for wound healing undergo lyophilization, sometimes in combination with decellularization. Given our expertise, we wanted to highlight the potential of decellularized/devitalized and lyophilized perinatal tissues in regenerative medicine, particularly for bone repair. In this opinion paper, we discuss why these tissues represent the future of regenerative medicine, their potential drawbacks and strategies to overcome these challenges.

Materials Today BioVol. 30
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Inserm (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR), University of Chieti-Pescara (IT), Laboratoire Réactions et Génie des Procédés (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon (FR), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR), Laboratory for the Bioengineering of Tissues (FR), Université de Lorraine (FR), Université de Franche-Comté (FR), Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (FR)
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.