Analysis of tunnel lining internal forces under the influence of S and P-waves: An analytical solution and quasi-static numerical method

This paper employs analytical and pseudo-static approaches to analyze the tunnel response under the compression (P) and shear (S) waves. In the first step, Einstein and Schwartz’s method is revised for calculating Tunnel Lining Internal Forces (TLIFs) under P-wave. Next, a comprehensive comparison is performed between TLIFs under S and P-waves in two extreme contact interfaces of no-slip (NS) and full-slip (FS) conditions. Lastly, the effect of the intermediate layer was investigated by quasi-static finite element numerical modeling. The results showed that the maximum value of the axial force under the P-wave exceeds that of the S-wave in both the NS and FS conditions. Also, the amount of bending moment and shear force in both the NS and FS conditions under the S-wave is almost twice the P-wave. In general, the weak interlayer causes a decrease in the maximum axial force and the axial force values in the range of placement of the weak interlayer with the tunnel. Besides, it increases the maximum bending moment and shear force compared to the homogeneous medium. It was also observed that the weak interlayer with low thickness causes unpredictable behavior under S and P-waves. Overall, the presence of a layer with different stiffness led to a significant effect on the TLIFs under S and P-waves and increased the complexity of the dynamic analysis of tunnel lining. Therefore, it should be simulated separately under NS and FS conditions. • An analytical method is presented for calculating tunnel lining internal forces (TLIFs) under P-wave. • A comprehensive comparison is performed between TLIFs under S and P-waves. • The effect of the intermediate layer was investigated by quasi-static FEM. • The axial force difference caused by the S-wave under NS and FS conditions is much higher than that caused by the P-wave by assuming the a h = a v = a s as well as V S = V P . • The presence of a layer with different stiffness led to a significant effect on the TLIFs under S and P-waves.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rock Mechanics Bulletin
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rockmb.2024.100168
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of tunnel lining internal forces under the influence of S and P-waves: An analytical solution and quasi-static numerical method

Rouhollah Basirat
7 citations
Rock Mechanics Bulletin
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
1.83
article

Analysis of tunnel lining internal forces under the influence of S and P-waves: An analytical solution and quasi-static numerical method

Rouhollah Basirat
article en
7 citations

Abstract

This paper employs analytical and pseudo-static approaches to analyze the tunnel response under the compression (P) and shear (S) waves. In the first step, Einstein and Schwartz’s method is revised for calculating Tunnel Lining Internal Forces (TLIFs) under P-wave. Next, a comprehensive comparison is performed between TLIFs under S and P-waves in two extreme contact interfaces of no-slip (NS) and full-slip (FS) conditions. Lastly, the effect of the intermediate layer was investigated by quasi-static finite element numerical modeling. The results showed that the maximum value of the axial force under the P-wave exceeds that of the S-wave in both the NS and FS conditions. Also, the amount of bending moment and shear force in both the NS and FS conditions under the S-wave is almost twice the P-wave. In general, the weak interlayer causes a decrease in the maximum axial force and the axial force values in the range of placement of the weak interlayer with the tunnel. Besides, it increases the maximum bending moment and shear force compared to the homogeneous medium. It was also observed that the weak interlayer with low thickness causes unpredictable behavior under S and P-waves. Overall, the presence of a layer with different stiffness led to a significant effect on the TLIFs under S and P-waves and increased the complexity of the dynamic analysis of tunnel lining. Therefore, it should be simulated separately under NS and FS conditions. • An analytical method is presented for calculating tunnel lining internal forces (TLIFs) under P-wave. • A comprehensive comparison is performed between TLIFs under S and P-waves. • The effect of the intermediate layer was investigated by quasi-static FEM. • The axial force difference caused by the S-wave under NS and FS conditions is much higher than that caused by the P-wave by assuming the a h = a v = a s as well as V S = V P . • The presence of a layer with different stiffness led to a significant effect on the TLIFs under S and P-waves.

Rock Mechanics BulletinVol. 4(1)
Institut für Solartechnologien (Germany) (DE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
1.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.