Economic shocks, gender, and populism: Evidence from Brazil

This paper investigates whether differential exposure to a labor market shock by gender contributed to the rise of far-right populism in Brazil. Using a shift-share approach, we find that gender heterogeneity in shock exposure predicts electoral outcomes. Male-specific labor demand shocks increase support for Jair Bolsonaro in the 2018 presidential election, but female-specific shocks have the reverse effect. These opposing effects are accompanied by an unprecedented gender gap in political preferences, with men becoming relatively more conservative. Our preferred interpretation is that Bolsonaro’s conservative rhetoric – shared by several other right-wing populists – generates appeal among men who experience a relative loss in economic status. • Gender-specific responses to a major recession predict votes for Bolsonaro in 2018. • Male-specific labor demand shocks increase support for Bolsonaro. • Female-specific shocks have the reverse effect. • Since 2018, an unprecedented gender gap in political preferences emerges in Brazil.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Development Economics
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103412
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic shocks, gender, and populism: Evidence from Brazil

Laura Barros, Manuel F. Silva
4 citations
Journal of Development Economics
Employment and Welfare Studies
3.40
article

Economic shocks, gender, and populism: Evidence from Brazil

Laura Barros, Manuel F. Silva
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper investigates whether differential exposure to a labor market shock by gender contributed to the rise of far-right populism in Brazil. Using a shift-share approach, we find that gender heterogeneity in shock exposure predicts electoral outcomes. Male-specific labor demand shocks increase support for Jair Bolsonaro in the 2018 presidential election, but female-specific shocks have the reverse effect. These opposing effects are accompanied by an unprecedented gender gap in political preferences, with men becoming relatively more conservative. Our preferred interpretation is that Bolsonaro’s conservative rhetoric – shared by several other right-wing populists – generates appeal among men who experience a relative loss in economic status. • Gender-specific responses to a major recession predict votes for Bolsonaro in 2018. • Male-specific labor demand shocks increase support for Bolsonaro. • Female-specific shocks have the reverse effect. • Since 2018, an unprecedented gender gap in political preferences emerges in Brazil.

Journal of Development EconomicsVol. 174
University of Göttingen (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Employment and Welfare Studies
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.