A simple blinding index for randomized controlled trials

Blinding is an essential part of many randomized controlled trials. However, its quality is usually not checked, and when it is, common measures are the James index and/or the Bang index. In the present paper we discuss these two indices, providing examples demonstrating their considerable weaknesses and limitations, and propose an alternative method for measuring blinding. We argue that this new approach has a number of advantages. We also provide an R-package for computing our blinding index.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101393
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A simple blinding index for randomized controlled trials

Miroslav Bačák, Patrick Dilk, David Petroff, Nikolaos Dagres et al.
4 citations
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
3.58
article

A simple blinding index for randomized controlled trials

Miroslav Bačák, Patrick Dilk, David Petroff, Nikolaos Dagres, Rolf Wachter
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Blinding is an essential part of many randomized controlled trials. However, its quality is usually not checked, and when it is, common measures are the James index and/or the Bang index. In the present paper we discuss these two indices, providing examples demonstrating their considerable weaknesses and limitations, and propose an alternative method for measuring blinding. We argue that this new approach has a number of advantages. We also provide an R-package for computing our blinding index.

Contemporary Clinical Trials CommunicationsVol. 42
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DE), Leipzig Heart Institute (DE), University Hospital Leipzig (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
3.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.