Diagnosing Allergic Contact Dermatitis Using Deep Learning: Single-Arm, Pragmatic Clinical Trial with an Observer Performance Study to Compare Artificial Intelligence Performance with Human Reader Performance

<u><b><i></i></b></u> <u><b><i>Background:</i></b></u> Allergic contact dermatitis is a common, pruritic, debilitating skin disease, affecting at least 20% of the population.<u><b><i>Objective:</i></b></u> To prospectively validate a computer vision algorithm across all Fitzpatrick skin types.<u><b><i>Methods:</i></b></u> Each participant was exposed to 10 allergens. The reference criterion was obtained 5 days after initial patch placement by a board-certified dermatologist. The algorithm processed photographs of the test site obtained on Day 5. Human performance in reading the photographs was also evaluated.<u><b><i>Results:</i></b></u> A total of 206 evaluable participants [mean age 39 years, 66% (136/206) female, and 47% with Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI] completed testing. Forty-two percent (87/206) of participants experienced 1 or more allergic reaction resulting in a total of 132 allergic reactions. The model provided high discrimination (AUROC 0.86, 95% CI: 0.82-0.90) and specificity (93%, 95% CI: 92%-94%) but with lower sensitivity (58%, 95% CI: 49%-67%). Human performance interpreting the photographs ranged from providing similar performance to the algorithm to providing superior performance when combined across readers. There were no serious adverse events.<u><b><i>Conclusions:</i></b></u> The combination of a smartphone capture of patch testing sites with deep learning yielded high discrimination across a diverse sample.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dermatitis
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/derm.2024.0302
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnosing Allergic Contact Dermatitis Using Deep Learning: Single-Arm, Pragmatic Clinical Trial with an Observer Performance Study to Compare Artificial Intelligence Performance with Human Reader Performance

Laura M. Pacheco-Spann, Maria A. Caruso, Rickey E. Carter, Matthew R. Hall et al.
3 citations
Dermatitis
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
1.60
article

Diagnosing Allergic Contact Dermatitis Using Deep Learning: Single-Arm, Pragmatic Clinical Trial with an Observer Performance Study to Compare Artificial Intelligence Performance with Human Reader Performance

Laura M. Pacheco-Spann, Maria A. Caruso, Rickey E. Carter, Matthew R. Hall, Charles J. Bruce, Mikolaj A. Wieczorek, Miguel Aristizabal, Alexander D. Weston, Sheikh Fahad, Alison J. Bruce
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<u><b><i></i></b></u> <u><b><i>Background:</i></b></u> Allergic contact dermatitis is a common, pruritic, debilitating skin disease, affecting at least 20% of the population.<u><b><i>Objective:</i></b></u> To prospectively validate a computer vision algorithm across all Fitzpatrick skin types.<u><b><i>Methods:</i></b></u> Each participant was exposed to 10 allergens. The reference criterion was obtained 5 days after initial patch placement by a board-certified dermatologist. The algorithm processed photographs of the test site obtained on Day 5. Human performance in reading the photographs was also evaluated.<u><b><i>Results:</i></b></u> A total of 206 evaluable participants [mean age 39 years, 66% (136/206) female, and 47% with Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI] completed testing. Forty-two percent (87/206) of participants experienced 1 or more allergic reaction resulting in a total of 132 allergic reactions. The model provided high discrimination (AUROC 0.86, 95% CI: 0.82-0.90) and specificity (93%, 95% CI: 92%-94%) but with lower sensitivity (58%, 95% CI: 49%-67%). Human performance interpreting the photographs ranged from providing similar performance to the algorithm to providing superior performance when combined across readers. There were no serious adverse events.<u><b><i>Conclusions:</i></b></u> The combination of a smartphone capture of patch testing sites with deep learning yielded high discrimination across a diverse sample.

Dermatitis
Jacksonville College (US), WinnMed (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
1.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.