Typical Structure of Hereditary Graph Families. II. Exotic Examples

ABSTRACT A graph is ‐free if it does not contain an induced subgraph isomorphic to . The study of the typical structure of ‐free graphs was initiated by Erdős, Kleitman, and Rothschild (1976), who have shown that almost all ‐free graphs are bipartite. Since then the typical structure of ‐free graphs has been determined for several families of graphs , including complete graphs, trees, and cycles. Recently, Reed and Scott proposed a conjectural description of the typical structure of ‐free graphs for all graphs , which extends all previously known results in the area. We construct an infinite family of graphs for which the Reed–Scott conjecture fails, and use the methods we developed in the prequel paper Norin and Yuditsky (2024) to describe the typical structure of ‐free graphs for graphs in this family. Using similar techniques, we construct an infinite family of graphs for which the maximum size of a homogenous set in a typical ‐free graph is sublinear in the number of vertices, answering a question of Loebl et al. (2010) and Kang et al. (2014).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Random Structures and Algorithms
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rsa.21272
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Typical Structure of Hereditary Graph Families. II. Exotic Examples

Sergey Norin, Yelena Yuditsky
1 citations
Random Structures and Algorithms
Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
1.32
article

Typical Structure of Hereditary Graph Families. II. Exotic Examples

Sergey Norin, Yelena Yuditsky
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT A graph is ‐free if it does not contain an induced subgraph isomorphic to . The study of the typical structure of ‐free graphs was initiated by Erdős, Kleitman, and Rothschild (1976), who have shown that almost all ‐free graphs are bipartite. Since then the typical structure of ‐free graphs has been determined for several families of graphs , including complete graphs, trees, and cycles. Recently, Reed and Scott proposed a conjectural description of the typical structure of ‐free graphs for all graphs , which extends all previously known results in the area. We construct an infinite family of graphs for which the Reed–Scott conjecture fails, and use the methods we developed in the prequel paper Norin and Yuditsky (2024) to describe the typical structure of ‐free graphs for graphs in this family. Using similar techniques, we construct an infinite family of graphs for which the maximum size of a homogenous set in a typical ‐free graph is sublinear in the number of vertices, answering a question of Loebl et al. (2010) and Kang et al. (2014).

Random Structures and AlgorithmsVol. 66(1)
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
1.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.