Vaginal Misoprostol Pharmacokinetic Changes in Obese Parturient Women Who Presented Labor Induction Failure

Clinical experience shows an increased duration of labor in obese parturient women. It is unclear if this population should receive the same dose of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor as non-obese parturient women. We investigate the influence of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and placental transfer of the metabolite misoprostol acid in parturient women. Parturient women (n = 40) were enrolled and received misoprostol 25 µg/6 h vaginally and were allocated into two groups according to the pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI <30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> non-obese, n = 18 or BMI >30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> obese, n = 22) or according to the labor induction outcome (failure [n = 10] or success [n = 30]). Blood collection for pharmacokinetic study occurred after the first misoprostol dose. The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained in non-obese parturient women were not statistically different from those obtained in obese group (P Value > .05). However, when the parturient women were grouped by the labor induction outcome, the failed labor induction group presented a higher (median [interquartile range]) BMI (44.4 [34.6-47.9] vs 33.7 [28.9-36.5] kg/m<sup>2</sup>) (P Value = .0017), lower C<sub>max</sub> (11.5 [4.82-22.2] vs 22.8 [14.2-30.8] pg/mL) (P Value = .0308) and not statistically different AUC<sub>0-6</sub> (31.8 [13.4-61.5] vs 53.4 [35.4-77.7]) pg•h/mL) (P Value = .0580) and t<sub>max</sub> (2.50 [1.19-4.25] vs 3.00 (1.88-5.00) h (P Value = .3198) when compared with parturient women who presented successful labor induction. This data suggests a higher loading dose (higher volume of distribution) and unchanged maintenance dose (unchanged AUC<sub>0-6</sub>) of misoprostol for this population. Further studies are required to investigate the efficacy and safety of higher misoprostol loading doses for this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.6166
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vaginal Misoprostol Pharmacokinetic Changes in Obese Parturient Women Who Presented Labor Induction Failure

Matheus de Lucca Thomaz, Maria Paula Marques, Gabriela Campos de Oliveira Filgueira, Jhohann Richard de Lima Benzi et al.
2 citations
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Reproductive Health and Contraception
1.09
article

Vaginal Misoprostol Pharmacokinetic Changes in Obese Parturient Women Who Presented Labor Induction Failure

Matheus de Lucca Thomaz, Maria Paula Marques, Gabriela Campos de Oliveira Filgueira, Jhohann Richard de Lima Benzi, Grazielle de Fátima Pinto Rodrigues, Vera Lúcia Lanchote, Ricardo de Carvalho Cavalli, Geraldo Duarte
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Clinical experience shows an increased duration of labor in obese parturient women. It is unclear if this population should receive the same dose of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor as non-obese parturient women. We investigate the influence of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and placental transfer of the metabolite misoprostol acid in parturient women. Parturient women (n = 40) were enrolled and received misoprostol 25 µg/6 h vaginally and were allocated into two groups according to the pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI <30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> non-obese, n = 18 or BMI >30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> obese, n = 22) or according to the labor induction outcome (failure [n = 10] or success [n = 30]). Blood collection for pharmacokinetic study occurred after the first misoprostol dose. The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained in non-obese parturient women were not statistically different from those obtained in obese group (P Value > .05). However, when the parturient women were grouped by the labor induction outcome, the failed labor induction group presented a higher (median [interquartile range]) BMI (44.4 [34.6-47.9] vs 33.7 [28.9-36.5] kg/m<sup>2</sup>) (P Value = .0017), lower C<sub>max</sub> (11.5 [4.82-22.2] vs 22.8 [14.2-30.8] pg/mL) (P Value = .0308) and not statistically different AUC<sub>0-6</sub> (31.8 [13.4-61.5] vs 53.4 [35.4-77.7]) pg•h/mL) (P Value = .0580) and t<sub>max</sub> (2.50 [1.19-4.25] vs 3.00 (1.88-5.00) h (P Value = .3198) when compared with parturient women who presented successful labor induction. This data suggests a higher loading dose (higher volume of distribution) and unchanged maintenance dose (unchanged AUC<sub>0-6</sub>) of misoprostol for this population. Further studies are required to investigate the efficacy and safety of higher misoprostol loading doses for this population.

The Journal of Clinical PharmacologyVol. 65(4)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
1.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.