Design and validation of CRISENSE, a novel critical competence assessment tool for Spanish adolescents and young adults

• This study emphasizes the necessity of acquiring critical competence at all educational levels and the challenges associated with measuring it effectively. • The research introduces CRISENSE, a newly developed critical competency measurement tool in Spanish, addressing three key dimensions: comprehension, deduction, and critical positioning. • CRISENSE reviews existing critical thinking tests such as that of Watson-Glasser and Halpern, stepping towards critical competence. • The tool underwent rigorous validation, including expert pre-testing and evaluation with a diverse sample of 575 students across secondary, high school, and university levels. • Results indicated strong validity and reliability of CRISENSE scores, supported by satisfactory psychometric indices, making it a valuable resource for assessing critical thinking in Spanish-speaking students. The acquisition of critical competence is essential at all educational levels. The measurement of this competency presents a significant challenge, particularly considering the methodological complexities involved. Developing tests to assess critical competence requires rigorous processes of elaboration and validation, without which the validity of the results can be affected. Most existing Spanish tests are translations from other languages –such as English. This often affects the readability of the questions, and in turn the validity of the tests. To address this issue, this study proposes and validates CRISENSE, a critical competency measurement tool created in Spanish that addresses three dimensions: comprehension, deduction, and critical positioning. CRISENSE was designed based on the existing Watson-Glasser and Halpern critical thinking tests, and pre-tested by a panel of experts in critical competence and reading comprehension. The resulting tool was subjected to testing with a sample population of 575 students, comprising individuals from secondary, high school, and university levels of education. The psychometric properties of the test were evaluated through descriptive analysis, item homogeneity, confirmatory factor analysis, and a measurement invariance study between sexes and between educational levels. Additionally, the reliability of the scores was evaluated using Cronbach's Alpha coefficient. The results demonstrated positive evidence of validity and reliability of the test scores, exhibiting satisfactory adjustment indices and coefficients in each analysis. Consequently, the critical thinking test can be deemed as a valuable tool for assessing this construct in Spanish students, contributing to the expansion of current scientific evidence on this topic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101708
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design and validation of CRISENSE, a novel critical competence assessment tool for Spanish adolescents and young adults

Elena Jiménez Pérez, Manuel León Urrutia, Pedro García Guirao
2 citations
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation
4.19
article

Design and validation of CRISENSE, a novel critical competence assessment tool for Spanish adolescents and young adults

Elena Jiménez Pérez, Manuel León Urrutia, Pedro García Guirao
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• This study emphasizes the necessity of acquiring critical competence at all educational levels and the challenges associated with measuring it effectively. • The research introduces CRISENSE, a newly developed critical competency measurement tool in Spanish, addressing three key dimensions: comprehension, deduction, and critical positioning. • CRISENSE reviews existing critical thinking tests such as that of Watson-Glasser and Halpern, stepping towards critical competence. • The tool underwent rigorous validation, including expert pre-testing and evaluation with a diverse sample of 575 students across secondary, high school, and university levels. • Results indicated strong validity and reliability of CRISENSE scores, supported by satisfactory psychometric indices, making it a valuable resource for assessing critical thinking in Spanish-speaking students. The acquisition of critical competence is essential at all educational levels. The measurement of this competency presents a significant challenge, particularly considering the methodological complexities involved. Developing tests to assess critical competence requires rigorous processes of elaboration and validation, without which the validity of the results can be affected. Most existing Spanish tests are translations from other languages –such as English. This often affects the readability of the questions, and in turn the validity of the tests. To address this issue, this study proposes and validates CRISENSE, a critical competency measurement tool created in Spanish that addresses three dimensions: comprehension, deduction, and critical positioning. CRISENSE was designed based on the existing Watson-Glasser and Halpern critical thinking tests, and pre-tested by a panel of experts in critical competence and reading comprehension. The resulting tool was subjected to testing with a sample population of 575 students, comprising individuals from secondary, high school, and university levels of education. The psychometric properties of the test were evaluated through descriptive analysis, item homogeneity, confirmatory factor analysis, and a measurement invariance study between sexes and between educational levels. Additionally, the reliability of the scores was evaluated using Cronbach's Alpha coefficient. The results demonstrated positive evidence of validity and reliability of the test scores, exhibiting satisfactory adjustment indices and coefficients in each analysis. Consequently, the critical thinking test can be deemed as a valuable tool for assessing this construct in Spanish students, contributing to the expansion of current scientific evidence on this topic.

Thinking Skills and CreativityVol. 56
University of Southampton (GB), Universidad de Málaga (ES)
Universidad de Málaga
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation
4.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.