Comparative analysis of counter-current and co-current downer reactors using particle image velocimetry and computational particle-fluid dynamics

• Experimental and simulation workflow to analyze downer reactor hydrodynamics. • We explore fluid dynamics in co- and countercurrent downer operations. • Particle image velocimetry and fluid dynamic simulations are used. • Higher solid holdup from counter-current downer under identical conditions. • More uniform axial particle velocity for the counter-current operation. We investigated the hydrodynamics in co- and counter-current downer operations using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and computational particle fluid dynamics simulations (CPFD). Pilot-scale experiments were conducted for fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts and sand, which verified the system stability and provided the validation basis for the simulation strategy. We compared the reactor characteristics of counter-current and co-current downers under different operating modes and conditions using PIV experiments and CPFD simulations. PIV experiments showed that the counter-current downer exhibits a more uniform particle velocity profile, with a gradient of only 8 % of the maximum velocity, compared to the co-current operation, which shows a significantly steeper gradient of 39.5 % from the maximum. Simulations confirmed that the counter-current downer reactor has 69 % higher solid holdup and 98 % longer residence time than the co-current operation. Thus, the counter-current downer reactor demonstrated intermediate behavior between the classical co-current downer and riser reactors, offering flexibility for industrial applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Engineering Journal Advances
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2024.100687
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of counter-current and co-current downer reactors using particle image velocimetry and computational particle-fluid dynamics

Abdulrahman Alzailaie, Pedro Castaño, Lujain Alfilfil, Abdullah A. Alhareth et al.
5 citations
Chemical Engineering Journal Advances
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
6.49
article

Comparative analysis of counter-current and co-current downer reactors using particle image velocimetry and computational particle-fluid dynamics

Abdulrahman Alzailaie, Pedro Castaño, Lujain Alfilfil, Abdullah A. Alhareth, Talal A. Aldugman, Mengmeng Cui, Jorge Gascón, Khalid Almajnouni, S. T. Thoroddsen, Kenneth R. Langley
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Experimental and simulation workflow to analyze downer reactor hydrodynamics. • We explore fluid dynamics in co- and countercurrent downer operations. • Particle image velocimetry and fluid dynamic simulations are used. • Higher solid holdup from counter-current downer under identical conditions. • More uniform axial particle velocity for the counter-current operation. We investigated the hydrodynamics in co- and counter-current downer operations using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and computational particle fluid dynamics simulations (CPFD). Pilot-scale experiments were conducted for fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts and sand, which verified the system stability and provided the validation basis for the simulation strategy. We compared the reactor characteristics of counter-current and co-current downers under different operating modes and conditions using PIV experiments and CPFD simulations. PIV experiments showed that the counter-current downer exhibits a more uniform particle velocity profile, with a gradient of only 8 % of the maximum velocity, compared to the co-current operation, which shows a significantly steeper gradient of 39.5 % from the maximum. Simulations confirmed that the counter-current downer reactor has 69 % higher solid holdup and 98 % longer residence time than the co-current operation. Thus, the counter-current downer reactor demonstrated intermediate behavior between the classical co-current downer and riser reactors, offering flexibility for industrial applications.

Chemical Engineering Journal AdvancesVol. 21
Saudi Arabia Basic Industries (Saudi Arabia) (SA), Saudi Aramco (United States) (US), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Saudi Aramco
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.