Advancing Forest Plot Surveys: A Comparative Study of Visual vs. LiDAR SLAM Technologies

Forest plot surveys are vital for monitoring forest resource growth, contributing to their sustainable development. The accuracy and efficiency of these surveys are paramount, making technological advancements such as Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) crucial. This study investigates the application of SLAM technology, utilizing LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) and monocular cameras, to enhance forestry plot surveys. Conducted in three 32 × 32 m plots within the Tibet Autonomous Region of China, the research compares the efficacy of LiDAR-based and visual SLAM algorithms in estimating tree parameters such as diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height, and position, alongside their adaptability to forest environments. The findings revealed that both types of algorithms achieved high precision in DBH estimation, with LiDAR SLAM presenting a root mean square error (RMSE) range of 1.4 to 1.96 cm and visual SLAM showing a slightly higher precision, with an RMSE of 0.72 to 0.85 cm. In terms of tree position accuracy, the three methods can achieve tree location measurements. LiDAR SLAM accurately represents the relative positions of trees, while the traditional and visual SLAM systems exhibit slight positional offsets for individual trees. However, discrepancies arose in tree height estimation accuracy, where visual SLAM exhibited a bias range from −0.55 to 0.19 m and an RMSE of 1.36 to 2.34 m, while LiDAR SLAM had a broader bias range and higher RMSE, especially for trees over 25 m, attributed to scanning angle limitations and branch occlusion. Moreover, the study highlights the comprehensive point cloud data generated by LiDAR SLAM, useful for calculating extensive tree parameters such as volume and carbon storage and Tree Information Modeling (TIM) through digital twin technology. In contrast, the sparser data from visual SLAM limits its use to basic parameter estimation. These insights underscore the effectiveness and precision of SLAM-based approaches in forestry plot surveys while also indicating distinct advantages and suitability of each method to different forest environments. The findings advocate for tailored survey strategies, aligning with specific forest conditions and requirements, enhancing the application of SLAM technology in forestry management and conservation efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122083
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing Forest Plot Surveys: A Comparative Study of Visual vs. LiDAR SLAM Technologies

Yuan-Kai Wang, Yu‐Lin Shen, Ping Zhang, Tianshuo Guan et al.
11 citations
Forests
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
2.26
article

Advancing Forest Plot Surveys: A Comparative Study of Visual vs. LiDAR SLAM Technologies

Yuan-Kai Wang, Yu‐Lin Shen, Ping Zhang, Tianshuo Guan, Fei Yan, Rui Wang
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Forest plot surveys are vital for monitoring forest resource growth, contributing to their sustainable development. The accuracy and efficiency of these surveys are paramount, making technological advancements such as Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) crucial. This study investigates the application of SLAM technology, utilizing LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) and monocular cameras, to enhance forestry plot surveys. Conducted in three 32 × 32 m plots within the Tibet Autonomous Region of China, the research compares the efficacy of LiDAR-based and visual SLAM algorithms in estimating tree parameters such as diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height, and position, alongside their adaptability to forest environments. The findings revealed that both types of algorithms achieved high precision in DBH estimation, with LiDAR SLAM presenting a root mean square error (RMSE) range of 1.4 to 1.96 cm and visual SLAM showing a slightly higher precision, with an RMSE of 0.72 to 0.85 cm. In terms of tree position accuracy, the three methods can achieve tree location measurements. LiDAR SLAM accurately represents the relative positions of trees, while the traditional and visual SLAM systems exhibit slight positional offsets for individual trees. However, discrepancies arose in tree height estimation accuracy, where visual SLAM exhibited a bias range from −0.55 to 0.19 m and an RMSE of 1.36 to 2.34 m, while LiDAR SLAM had a broader bias range and higher RMSE, especially for trees over 25 m, attributed to scanning angle limitations and branch occlusion. Moreover, the study highlights the comprehensive point cloud data generated by LiDAR SLAM, useful for calculating extensive tree parameters such as volume and carbon storage and Tree Information Modeling (TIM) through digital twin technology. In contrast, the sparser data from visual SLAM limits its use to basic parameter estimation. These insights underscore the effectiveness and precision of SLAM-based approaches in forestry plot surveys while also indicating distinct advantages and suitability of each method to different forest environments. The findings advocate for tailored survey strategies, aligning with specific forest conditions and requirements, enhancing the application of SLAM technology in forestry management and conservation efforts.

ForestsVol. 15(12)
Tibet University (CN), Beijing Forestry University (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.