A systematic method to integrate co‐produced causal loop diagrams based on feedback stories

Abstract Within participatory systems dynamics, more practitioners are compiling co‐produced causal loop diagrams (CLDs) to analyse and report workshop outputs. Though not formalized, existing documented techniques have been limited to analyses of representations in single‐group diagrams predicated on, at times, untraceable subjective judgements. This paper addresses the need for a systematic method to guide and justify the subjective decisions made in the integration process. We propose a multistep, three‐stage process that synthesizes feedback stories from representations in diagrams (i.e. what is represented) and transcripts of the participatory process (i.e. what is said). This approach enables practitioners to report the interpretive scheme through which qualitative data are analysed and, thus, support the subjective decisions they made during the integration process. Using a case study, we demonstrate the application of this method and its potential for narrowing the semantic distance between participants, practitioners and external audience for interpreting and analysing an integrated diagram. © 2024 The Author(s). System Dynamics Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of System Dynamics Society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
System Dynamics Review
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1794
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic method to integrate co‐produced causal loop diagrams based on feedback stories

Jefferson K. Rajah, Birgit Kopainsky
13 citations
System Dynamics Review
Complex Systems and Decision Making
6.38
article

A systematic method to integrate co‐produced causal loop diagrams based on feedback stories

Jefferson K. Rajah, Birgit Kopainsky
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Abstract Within participatory systems dynamics, more practitioners are compiling co‐produced causal loop diagrams (CLDs) to analyse and report workshop outputs. Though not formalized, existing documented techniques have been limited to analyses of representations in single‐group diagrams predicated on, at times, untraceable subjective judgements. This paper addresses the need for a systematic method to guide and justify the subjective decisions made in the integration process. We propose a multistep, three‐stage process that synthesizes feedback stories from representations in diagrams (i.e. what is represented) and transcripts of the participatory process (i.e. what is said). This approach enables practitioners to report the interpretive scheme through which qualitative data are analysed and, thus, support the subjective decisions they made during the integration process. Using a case study, we demonstrate the application of this method and its potential for narrowing the semantic distance between participants, practitioners and external audience for interpreting and analysing an integrated diagram. © 2024 The Author(s). System Dynamics Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of System Dynamics Society.

System Dynamics ReviewVol. 41(1)
University of Bergen (NO)
European Commission
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
6.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.