Estimation and Control of WRRF Biogas Production

The development of resource-efficient digital technologies is a critical challenge in the wastewater sector. This industrial case study, conducted in collaboration with the Veas Water Resource Recovery Facility in Norway, focused on creating data pre-processing methods and resource-efficient control strategies. Using data from the Veas biogas plant, dynamic models were developed to compare control outcomes. The primary objective was to maximize biogas production and hot water usage while maintaining optimal temperature and hydraulic retention time by adjusting inlet sludge and hot water flow rates. Sequential operations were approximated as continuous operations using a 30-min moving minimum/maximum for bimodal data and a 2-h moving average for noisy data. The data-driven dynamic models achieved an accuracy of up to R2 of 0.85. The control strategy, which included one feedback controller, one ratio controller, and flow rate restrictions, was compared to real production data (baseline) and tested across six scenarios. The best improvement over the baseline scenario resulted in a 3% increase in total biogas production, a 6% increase in total organic loading, a 13% increase in hot water use, and a one-day reduction in hydraulic retention time. Future work should focus on control studies using extended datasets and nonlinear models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en17235922
Primary Topic
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimation and Control of WRRF Biogas Production

Simen Antonsen, Tiina M. Komulainen, Kjell Rune Jonassen
Energies
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
article

Estimation and Control of WRRF Biogas Production

Simen Antonsen, Tiina M. Komulainen, Kjell Rune Jonassen
article en

Abstract

The development of resource-efficient digital technologies is a critical challenge in the wastewater sector. This industrial case study, conducted in collaboration with the Veas Water Resource Recovery Facility in Norway, focused on creating data pre-processing methods and resource-efficient control strategies. Using data from the Veas biogas plant, dynamic models were developed to compare control outcomes. The primary objective was to maximize biogas production and hot water usage while maintaining optimal temperature and hydraulic retention time by adjusting inlet sludge and hot water flow rates. Sequential operations were approximated as continuous operations using a 30-min moving minimum/maximum for bimodal data and a 2-h moving average for noisy data. The data-driven dynamic models achieved an accuracy of up to R2 of 0.85. The control strategy, which included one feedback controller, one ratio controller, and flow rate restrictions, was compared to real production data (baseline) and tested across six scenarios. The best improvement over the baseline scenario resulted in a 3% increase in total biogas production, a 6% increase in total organic loading, a 13% increase in hot water use, and a one-day reduction in hydraulic retention time. Future work should focus on control studies using extended datasets and nonlinear models.

EnergiesVol. 17(23)
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Estimation and Control of WRRF Biogas Production — Simen Antonsen, Tiina M. Komulainen, et al. · Energies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS