Evaluation of Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM Ceramic Crowns and Scanning Time Using Different Intraoral Scanning Systems

This study aimed to evaluate the scanning time and marginal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated using different intraoral scanning systems (IOS) (O1-Omnicam 1.0, O2-Omnicam 2.0, PS-Primescan). A standardized, 3D-printed composite resin die with a full-crown tooth preparation was scanned ten times with each IOS, and the scanning time was recorded. Subsequently, lithium disilicate ceramic crowns were designed and milled. The crowns were seated in the die and scanned using micro-computed tomography to assess the marginal fit. Fifty-two measurements were performed for each crown. Data were assessed for homogeneity, and one-way analysis of variance and the Tukey HSD test were performed (α = 0.05). For the analysis of vertical fit categories, the chi-square (Fisher's exact) test (α = 0.05) was used. The mean vertical fit values were: O1-46.7 ± 16.4 μm, O2-33.8 ± 21.4 μm (<i>p</i> = 0.041), and PS-12.3 ± 6.6 μm (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The vertical fit values were further categorized by percentage and representative specimens were scanned with electron microscopy to evaluate adaptation. The mean scanning times were: O1-37.4 ± 3.1 s; O2-34.8 ± 2.7 s; and PS-27.8 ± 1.9 s. Significant differences were observed in the scanning times and marginal fit values of the CAD/CAM ceramic crowns across the different IOS systems, with PS demonstrating the best results. Improvements in IOS hardware and software significantly influence these outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15120359
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM Ceramic Crowns and Scanning Time Using Different Intraoral Scanning Systems

Luís Henrique Araújo Raposo, Marcel Santana Prudente, Gustavo Mendonça, Breno Araújo de Melo et al.
5 citations
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Dental materials and restorations
2.01
article

Evaluation of Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM Ceramic Crowns and Scanning Time Using Different Intraoral Scanning Systems

Luís Henrique Araújo Raposo, Marcel Santana Prudente, Gustavo Mendonça, Breno Araújo de Melo, Ari Lucas Santos Oliveira, Leandro Maruki Pereira, Flávio Domingues das Neves
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the scanning time and marginal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated using different intraoral scanning systems (IOS) (O1-Omnicam 1.0, O2-Omnicam 2.0, PS-Primescan). A standardized, 3D-printed composite resin die with a full-crown tooth preparation was scanned ten times with each IOS, and the scanning time was recorded. Subsequently, lithium disilicate ceramic crowns were designed and milled. The crowns were seated in the die and scanned using micro-computed tomography to assess the marginal fit. Fifty-two measurements were performed for each crown. Data were assessed for homogeneity, and one-way analysis of variance and the Tukey HSD test were performed (α = 0.05). For the analysis of vertical fit categories, the chi-square (Fisher's exact) test (α = 0.05) was used. The mean vertical fit values were: O1-46.7 ± 16.4 μm, O2-33.8 ± 21.4 μm (<i>p</i> = 0.041), and PS-12.3 ± 6.6 μm (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The vertical fit values were further categorized by percentage and representative specimens were scanned with electron microscopy to evaluate adaptation. The mean scanning times were: O1-37.4 ± 3.1 s; O2-34.8 ± 2.7 s; and PS-27.8 ± 1.9 s. Significant differences were observed in the scanning times and marginal fit values of the CAD/CAM ceramic crowns across the different IOS systems, with PS demonstrating the best results. Improvements in IOS hardware and software significantly influence these outcomes.

Journal of Functional BiomaterialsVol. 15(12)
Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Dental materials and restorations
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.